New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Wee 'Wet Suits' Are Big Advance for Microscopy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The magnifying powers of a scanning electron microscope (SEM) can make a blood clot look like a traffic jam or turn a simple dust bunny into a jungle of seemingly massive threads. The technology, which employs electrons instead of light to scan surfaces, exposes samples to a harsh vacuum. Because water becomes unstable under these conditions, drying processes were developed to retain key structural elements of hydrated samples, such as cells and tissue. It would be preferable to observe the samples in their original state, however. Findings published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences point to a novel way of doing just that.

Stephan Thiberge of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and his colleagues developed the wet-SEM method. To protect the water in the biological samples from boiling explosively under the vacuum, the researchers encased the samples in a thin polymer membrane. This "wet suit" is invisible to the electron beam but is tough enough to withstand atmospheric pressure differences and protect its contents. The new setup provides advantages over standard SEM, the researchers report. One, they state, is that "SEM can now be used to probe the inside of whole cells, giving information on organelles and internal structure." (The image above is a wet-SEM image of the sciatic nerve of a rat.)

The pictures produced by the new technique have a slightly lower resolution than do those produced by traditional SEM but provide higher magnification than optical methods do. In addition, the team notes, "An ability to observe fully hydrated samples at room or body temperatures could help eliminate many artifacts of sample preparation and allow routine and reproducible imaging."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe