What a Scientist Looks Like

Learn how today's scientists are working to update people's perceptions of science, how it's done and who scientists are

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Kids form cultural impressions early, deciding where and how they'll fit into the world. Unfortunately, they don’t see science in their future often enough. Children as young as kindergarteners, when asked to draw a scientist, are likely to make a picture of a white man in a white lab coat (See Start Science Sooner—and they don't see themselves that way.

But what if they saw that scientists come in all shapes and colors? And what if they saw how cool science actually is as a career? An absolutely charming site This Is What a Scientist Looks Like invites scientists to change perceptions about what a scientist is or isn't by being themselves: contributors submit their picture and a short description about what they do. Allie Wilkinson, freelance science communicator and social media specialist, created the site to challenge cultural impressions. "The feedback for the project that I have seen across social media has been incredible both in quantity and enthusiasm," she told me in an e-mail. "My inbox is overflowing with scientists, and each time I see the new submissions, I can't help but smile at all of the heartwarming, fun or quirky photos that are coming in."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So we invite you to meet some of those scientists by clicking the photos on the right—and, if you're a scientist, maybe you'd like to contribute an image of your own to Wilkinson’s site.

Want more? You may enjoy seeing how student impressions changed in Who's the Scientist?. The site shows drawings of what 7th graders thought scientists looked like before and after they visited Fermilab.

And if you're a teacher or a scientist, you might check out Scientific American's 1,000 Scientists in 1,000 Days, which connects educators with researcher volunteers who are willing to visit the classroom. You can also watch a NY1 video about how a visiting biologist at one New York City school changed impressions.

Last, scientists can share their personal stories at I Am Science and via #iamscience on Twitter, which Scientific American blogger Kevin Zelnio started. See his touching post.—Mariette DiChristina

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe