New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What Companies Are Leading the Way in Wireless Charging Technology?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In my Scientific American column this month, I tried to figure out what’s holding up distance-charging technologies, which purport to recharge your phone, tablet, watch, fitness band, and so on through the air.
Here’s a status snapshot of the companies leading the way.

  • PowerCast. Shipping FCC-approved distance charging products since 2010—for industrial use. Sends only microwatts or milliwatts (not enough to charge a phone). Device must remain stationary, placed in a predefined spot; the transmitter can’t follow it in space.

  • WiTricity. Uses magnetic resonance to charge the receiving devices; the company says that this technology is safe, capable of passing through stone, glass, concrete or wood, and can transfer power with the same efficiency, and in the same amounts, as a cable. Focused on charging pads for electric cars, having teamed up with companies like Toyota, General Motors, and Nissan, although its technology also powers a new Dell laptop that charges from a pad.

  • uBeam. Uses ultrasound waves, not radio waves, to send power to prototype consumer devices. The receiving gadget must have line of sight to the transmitter—not blocked by your body, clothing, or furniture. The company needs FCC approval, and former employees have described its technology as unworkable.

  • Ossia. An array of hundreds or thousands of antennas charges a device that you’re carrying or wearing anywhere in the room. Your phone (for example) sends 100 “beacon” signals per second, which lets the antennas locate it. The transceivers then send power back along the same pathways, bouncing off of floors, ceilings, and walls if necessary (no line of sight required). The company says it expects to get FCC approval, and has equipment-makers signed up as customers.

  • Energous. This system works much like Ossia’s, except that the gadget’s Bluetooth circuitry identifies its position in the room. The transmitter’s array of antennas sends a “pocket of energy” to the device. The company says that it can provide a phone in the middle of the room with, at best, a “trickle charge.” Energous expects FCC approval for its desktop “midfield” transmitter (two- or three-foot range, ideal for cordless keyboards and mice) by the end of 2017.

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 317 Issue 3This article was published with the title “What Companies Are Leading the Way in Wireless Charging Technology?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 317 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092017-1qpTsWmTbxax4F50TpBAD7

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe