New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

What do we know about the evolution of sleep--when it arose and why? Bacteria surely don't sleep, do they?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Irene Tobler is a researcher at the Institute of Pharmacology at the University of Zurich. She responds:

Most animals, and probably most living organisms, exhibit a circadian rest-activity rhythm. It is possible that sleep may have evolved from rest to allow more flexibility within this rather rigid rhythm of rest and activity. Researchers think that sleep arose to allow organisms to conserve and restore their energy. All mammals and birds sleep, as defined by the typical changes in brain waves associated with sleep. Reptiles also display changes in brain-wave states that correlate with changes in behavior, but scientists have not unambiguously demonstrated the existence in reptiles of the two sleep states (rapid-eye-movement sleep and non-rapid-eye movement sleep) that are found in mammals and birds. For amphibia and fish, it is possible to make a behavioral definition of sleep-like states, although not many species have been investigated.

For invertebrates, it is possible to identify elements--such as body position, arousal threshold, muscle activity and heart rate--that allow us to differentiate rest from sleep. Particularly in insects, but also in the scorpion and some crustaceans, researchers have identified a rest state that is similar to sleep.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to a circadian component, sleep in vertebrates is characterized by a homeostatic component: sleep is regulated in its intensity as a function of the duration of previous wakefulness. Experiments have elicited a homeostatic response to some hours of "rest deprivation" in scorpions and several cockroach species--that is, they were more restful during recovery. This finding indicates that regulatory aspects of sleep may be present in invertebrates as well. Further back in the evolutionary tree, the existence of a sleep state has been described only anecdotally (for example, in cephalopods (squids and octopi) and aplysia ("sea hair" molluscs). The presence or absence of a true sleep state among these creatures remains to be investigated scientifically.

It seems that the elementary features which characterize sleep in its most evolved state--as it is found in mammals and birds--are already present even in very primitive organisms. At all phylogenetic levels, scientists are faced with the challenge of identifying exactly what aspects of the organism are "restored" during sleep. Once these are found, we may be able to provide a meaningful answer to the question of whether unicellular organisms (bacteria, for instance) sleep.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe