Slide Show: What Does Carbon Capture and Storage Look Like?
From the North Sea to Texas, this slide show looks at existing technology to take the carbon dioxide out of coal burning and other fossil fuel use
By David Biello
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Editor's Note: This is the second in a series of five features on carbon capture and storage, running daily from April 6 to April 10, 2009.
From GreenGen in Tianjin, China, to the Edwardsport facility in Edwardsport, Ind., power plants are beginning to be built with so-called carbon capture and storage (CCS)—technology that captures the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) and locks it away from the atmosphere.
In fact, all the elements of industrial CCS technology already exist. The only issue is putting all the pieces together at one large, coal-fired power plant—which is what governments and some private companies are beginning to do.
"How do you take CCS from where we are now, which is a smattering of technology demonstrations, to a full-fledged industry over the next 20 years?" asks John Thompson, director of the coal transition project for the Clean Air Task Force, a Boston–based environmental group. "It's the same as moving from Kitty Hawk, which was a technology demonstration of flight, in 1903 to the postal air mail carrying some 14 million packages per year by 1925. What we need are the kinds of policy incentives that are equivalent to air mail," such as a cost for CO2 emissions and a subsidy for captured and stored CO2.
View photos of Carbon Capture and Storage
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
