What is 'gel electrophoresis,' and why is it so important for DNA testing in criminal cases?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Eric Fairfield is a private researcher who uses gel electrophoresis for separation of DNA molecules; he won an R&D award for the invention of a new method of gel electrophoresis. He replies:

"DNA is a charged molecule. Consequently, DNA molecules will move when an electrical field is applied to a liquid in which they are dissolved. If the liquid is a simple one--such as water with some salts in it--all the DNA molecules move at nearly the same speed. Under those conditions, it is hard to distinguish the tiny disparities in the motion of different kinds of DNA.

"If the solution is made less liquid, as in a gel, and the DNA molecules all start moving across the solution from some initial small volume--that is, from essentially the same staring point--then the molecules can move at perceptibly different speeds. Usually smaller DNA molecules move faster than larger ones. After a while, the molecules are separated by size. If the molecules fall into only a few discreet sizes, then bands (little rectangles) of DNA will appear in the gel. Each of these bands contains DNA strands of a specific size."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Editors note: DNA fingerprinting uses gel electrophoresis to distinguish between samples of the genetic material. The human DNA molecules are treated with enzymes that chop them at certain characteristic points, thereby reducing the DNA to a collection of more manageably sized pieces. The DNA fragments are loaded into a gel and placed in an electrical field, which electrophoretically sorts the DNA fragments into various bands. These bands can be colored with a radioactive dye to make them visible to imaging techniques.]

"For individual people, the bands of DNA created through this process will have a pattern that is specific to the individual. Part of this pattern comes from the size of the DNA; part of it comes from the sequence of the DNA of a specific size.

"In forensics, suspects can be eliminated if their DNA pattern does not match the pattern of DNA molecules found at the crime scene. Other people may become suspects become if their DNA pattern matches the pattern of the person who committed the crime and if the suspect's DNA pattern is not very common. The idea behind 'not very common' is that the DNA says, in essence, 'This crime was committed by a 6'2" white male who has a scar on the left wrist, went to U.C.L.A., drives a red 1992 sports car, makes $62,000 a year and was a disc jockey in 1978.' While there may be more than one such person, it is not likely that more than one of them was at the scene of the crime at the same time."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe