New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

What is 'gel electrophoresis,' and why is it so important for DNA testing in criminal cases?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Eric Fairfield is a private researcher who uses gel electrophoresis for separation of DNA molecules; he won an R&D award for the invention of a new method of gel electrophoresis. He replies:

"DNA is a charged molecule. Consequently, DNA molecules will move when an electrical field is applied to a liquid in which they are dissolved. If the liquid is a simple one--such as water with some salts in it--all the DNA molecules move at nearly the same speed. Under those conditions, it is hard to distinguish the tiny disparities in the motion of different kinds of DNA.

"If the solution is made less liquid, as in a gel, and the DNA molecules all start moving across the solution from some initial small volume--that is, from essentially the same staring point--then the molecules can move at perceptibly different speeds. Usually smaller DNA molecules move faster than larger ones. After a while, the molecules are separated by size. If the molecules fall into only a few discreet sizes, then bands (little rectangles) of DNA will appear in the gel. Each of these bands contains DNA strands of a specific size."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Editors note: DNA fingerprinting uses gel electrophoresis to distinguish between samples of the genetic material. The human DNA molecules are treated with enzymes that chop them at certain characteristic points, thereby reducing the DNA to a collection of more manageably sized pieces. The DNA fragments are loaded into a gel and placed in an electrical field, which electrophoretically sorts the DNA fragments into various bands. These bands can be colored with a radioactive dye to make them visible to imaging techniques.]

"For individual people, the bands of DNA created through this process will have a pattern that is specific to the individual. Part of this pattern comes from the size of the DNA; part of it comes from the sequence of the DNA of a specific size.

"In forensics, suspects can be eliminated if their DNA pattern does not match the pattern of DNA molecules found at the crime scene. Other people may become suspects become if their DNA pattern matches the pattern of the person who committed the crime and if the suspect's DNA pattern is not very common. The idea behind 'not very common' is that the DNA says, in essence, 'This crime was committed by a 6'2" white male who has a scar on the left wrist, went to U.C.L.A., drives a red 1992 sports car, makes $62,000 a year and was a disc jockey in 1978.' While there may be more than one such person, it is not likely that more than one of them was at the scene of the crime at the same time."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe