What is it?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A small, small world: Each year Nikon solicits entries from thousands of scientists who use cameras and light microscopes to capture images of phenomena invisible to the naked eye. This year's winner, announced October 13, is Jonas G. King, a Ph.D. candidate in biological sciences at Vanderbilt University. King and his lab's principal investigator, Julián F. Hillyer, study the circulatory system of mosquitoes as it relates to malaria. [Also see “Halting the World's Most Lethal Parasite,” on page 68.] Their winning picture is of a mosquito heart, a two-millimeter-long tube, part of which is visible in the center of this micrograph.

To capture the image, King and Hillyer sliced through the abdomen of Anopheles gambiae, the most important carrier of malaria. (The parasite becomes infective to humans as it travels from a mosquito's midgut to its salivary glands.) The team unfolded the abdomen's outer walls, scooped out the internal organs but left the heart in place. They then stained the tissue using fluorescent dyes. The green in the photo reveals the heart musculature; the blue shows the cell nuclei. The image helps scientists see how mosquitoes pump blood and, by extension, the malaria parasite through their bodies.

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 5This article was published with the title “What is it?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 5 (), p. 33
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1110-33

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe