New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

What Is It?

A closer look at a two-millimeter pond invertebrate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Smaller fleas: What appears as a mere speck to the human eye has plenty of character when observed under a microscope. The nearly invisible Daphnia, a water flea, came to life with tufts of hair, big eyes and red “lips” when magnified 50 times. Kevin Mackenzie, manager of the University of Aberdeen’s Microscopy and Imaging Facility in Scotland, photographed this two-millimeter pond invertebrate whose wispy hair is actually a pair of antennae. The beauty mark below its compound eye (black) is a light-sensing organ called an ocellus. The flea’s transparent body also reveals its last meal: algae (green).

In February scientists reported sequencing the genome of a Daphnia species, D. pulex, for the first time. The sequence will help researchers study how the environment influences the functions of genes, says project leader John Colbourne of Indiana University. Municipalities have long monitored Daphnia population sizes for signs of water pollution, because the critter is extremely sensitive to it. Looking at alterations in gene behavior, he notes, can also provide new clues to how chemicals might affect human health.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 4This article was published with the title “What Is It?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042011-7mQGRNR2zhKneFLchAbPZ9

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe