On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Scientists have long wondered how jumping spiders such as this one get visual information quickly and accurately enough to catch flies. In a study published in the journal Science in January, Takashi Nagata of Japan’s Osaka City University and his colleagues reported that jumping spiders compare focused and unfocused images to perceive depth—with a color twist. The investigators knew that the two innermost layers of a jumping spider’s two principal eyes (seen here as the two largest eyes) are tuned toward green light. But they focus that light differently: the deepest layer focuses green light clearly, and the second layer receives defocused images. To test whether differences in the two layers were important for depth perception, Nagata’s team shone green light on the spiders and tempted them with tasty flies. The spiders made spot-on jumps. Yet when the team bathed the prey in red light that did not contain green wavelengths, the spiders consistently missed their prey.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
