What Is Your Most Significant "What If...?" Moment?

Share some details from one of your most fateful experiences and your story could appear in Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Share Your StoryUpload

Do you ever wonder whether things would be different if a specific event or decision happened differently or not at all? Perhaps you’ve thought of alternative versions of your life where you never met your significant other, ended up in a different job or lived on the other side of the world.

We’ve all looked back on our lives and reimagined important moments unfolding in different ways. This tendency to mentally simulate past events while tweaking some critical details is known as counterfactual (“contrary to fact”) thinking.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Counterfactual thinking has its benefits. A 2008 paper published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology revealed that people who thought about how an important, positive event might not have happened (meeting a lover, for example) showed a higher increase in satisfaction than those who just thought about how the event occurred.

But occasionally our “What if…?” stories contribute to our discontent. Bronze medalists are generally happier than silver medalists because the latter are more likely to think about almost winning gold whereas former usually imagine the possibility of not winning anything at all.

Thinking about the past can also change our outlook on the future—for good or ill. Researchers at the University of North Texas found that reimagining a negative past event and thinking “it could have been worse” led to more optimistic expectations for the future whereas the thought “it could have been better” led to more pessimistic ones.

Share a couple sentences about a moment from your past that you often revisit and think, “What if…?” in the box below. Your story could be selected to appear in the print edition of Scientific American MIND or featured on the Web. To be considered for inclusion in the print edition of MIND, please submit your stories by August 2, 2015.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe