New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What Is Your Most Significant "What If...?" Moment?

Share some details from one of your most fateful experiences and your story could appear in Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Share Your StoryUpload

Do you ever wonder whether things would be different if a specific event or decision happened differently or not at all? Perhaps you’ve thought of alternative versions of your life where you never met your significant other, ended up in a different job or lived on the other side of the world.

We’ve all looked back on our lives and reimagined important moments unfolding in different ways. This tendency to mentally simulate past events while tweaking some critical details is known as counterfactual (“contrary to fact”) thinking.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Counterfactual thinking has its benefits. A 2008 paper published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology revealed that people who thought about how an important, positive event might not have happened (meeting a lover, for example) showed a higher increase in satisfaction than those who just thought about how the event occurred.

But occasionally our “What if…?” stories contribute to our discontent. Bronze medalists are generally happier than silver medalists because the latter are more likely to think about almost winning gold whereas former usually imagine the possibility of not winning anything at all.

Thinking about the past can also change our outlook on the future—for good or ill. Researchers at the University of North Texas found that reimagining a negative past event and thinking “it could have been worse” led to more optimistic expectations for the future whereas the thought “it could have been better” led to more pessimistic ones.

Share a couple sentences about a moment from your past that you often revisit and think, “What if…?” in the box below. Your story could be selected to appear in the print edition of Scientific American MIND or featured on the Web. To be considered for inclusion in the print edition of MIND, please submit your stories by August 2, 2015.

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe