What Role for New Neurons?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Adult rodents form more new neurons than usual when placed in spacious habitats with toys and running wheels, so researchers had supposed that neuron formation, called neurogenesis, also causes the decreased anxiety as well as the enhanced learning and memory brought on by richer environments. Looking to test the connection further, Columbia University researchers precisely irradiated and disabled the hippocampal region where mice form new neurons. Surprisingly, when placed in enriched surroundings, the irradiated mice performed just as well as intact rodents in spatial learning tests and were equally less anxious. The result suggests neurogenesis is not responsible for the effects of enrichment, at least in mice, the investigators note in the April 30 online Nature Neuroscience. The study also raises tantalizing questions about the role of neurogenesis in humans, as some research has suggested that the process is important in the treatment of depression.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “What Role for New Neurons?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-32d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe