New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What Role for New Neurons?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Adult rodents form more new neurons than usual when placed in spacious habitats with toys and running wheels, so researchers had supposed that neuron formation, called neurogenesis, also causes the decreased anxiety as well as the enhanced learning and memory brought on by richer environments. Looking to test the connection further, Columbia University researchers precisely irradiated and disabled the hippocampal region where mice form new neurons. Surprisingly, when placed in enriched surroundings, the irradiated mice performed just as well as intact rodents in spatial learning tests and were equally less anxious. The result suggests neurogenesis is not responsible for the effects of enrichment, at least in mice, the investigators note in the April 30 online Nature Neuroscience. The study also raises tantalizing questions about the role of neurogenesis in humans, as some research has suggested that the process is important in the treatment of depression.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “What Role for New Neurons?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-32d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe