New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What the White House's Opioid Emergency Declaration Means

The move makes it easier for treatment to be prescribed remotely, but does not allocate more money for the crisis

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

WASHINGTON — President Trump will instruct the Department of Health and Human Services to declare the opioid crisis a public health emergency, the administration said Thursday.

It is a major step in combating the drug epidemic and a major follow-through on a longstanding presidential promise. But White House officials were quick to caution that the administration’s response won’t end with the declaration, with a number of new rules and actions expected to be issued in the coming weeks.

As of Thursday: What does the emergency declaration entail?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What’s in it

Telemedicine: The administration said a regulatory change would allow for the prescription of “medicine commonly used for substance abuse or mental health treatment” via telemedicine. Addiction experts have said that would be a major step toward allowing individuals in rural areas with substance use disorder to access care.

Personnel: The declaration allows HHS, and states with governors who request it, to “make temporary appointments of specialists with the tools and talent needed to respond effectively” to the crisis.

Laborgrants: In a move it said is “subject to available funding,” the White House will instruct the Department of Labor to issue “dislocated worker grants” to those displaced from the workforce due to the opioid crisis.

HIV/AIDS resource shifts: The administration said it would shift resources within existing programs aimed at delivering HIV/AIDS care to better serve those with both HIV/AIDS and substance use disorder.

What’s not

Money: The emergency declaration relies on a public health emergency fund that, according to HHS, currently is worth only $57,000. Senior administration officials said they expected the opioid crisis to figure heavily into ongoing budget negotiations and a spending bill Congress must pass by December, but declined to specify a dollar figure.

IMD exclusion: The emergency declaration does not change a law that treatment advocates have criticized as creating a bottleneck for delivering some addiction care — a ban on Medicaid reimbursements for treatment facilities with more than 16 beds. The administration could change the rule in the future, or Congress could take up already-introduced legislation that would eliminate the restriction.

Increased access to overdose reversal drugs: White House officials did not discuss efforts to make overdose reversal drugs like naloxone more widely available on Thursday morning. Advocates had hoped for funding, a form of drug price negotiation, or access to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Strategic National Stockpile to allow local governments and health providers to distribute more of the drugs.

Changes to privacy and patient information laws: The action on Thursday will not address privacy laws that some experts say prevent doctors from prescribing opioids with the best available information, either via regulatory changes or the endorsement of a bill currently before Congress.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on October 26, 2017

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe