New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Whatever Helps You Feel Less Afraid, Tired and Lonely, Do That

Research on positive psychology may help prevent burnout

Scientific American MIND, May 2020

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the past several weeks I’ve often wondered what Bruce McEwen would make of the current state of the world. McEwen was a neuroscientist and endocrinologist at the Rockefeller University who spent his career studying how stress impacts the brain. In 1968 he and his team made the seminal discovery that stress hormones such as cortisol enter the brain and effect neurological function. Exposure to chronic stress factors in the environment creates allostatic load, a term McEwen coined in 1993. Enough stress over long periods leads to measurable changes in brain chemistry and gene expression—and not necessarily for the better. McEwen passed away on January 3 of this year at the age of 81.

I imagine the world events during his career that might have caused McEwen to feel that his work was particularly pertinent, almost painfully relevant: the Vietnam War. The attacks of September 11. I can only guess that he’d feel the same today. Doctors, nurses, administrators, first responders, pharmacists, grocery workers, package delivery personnel, construction workers—they are all dealing with inordinate stress at this time. And so is everyone else—from those working from home alone, parents juggling their jobs and teaching kids full-time from their living rooms, and those who’ve lost their jobs, worrying over how they’re going to survive the coming months. Life is stressful enough in ordinary times, and now we are dealing with heightened allostatic load under the uncertainty and strife of each day.

In this issue, health care worker Ashten Duncan writes that we can’t continue to overlook the importance of personal well-being when it comes to how well we (and especially health care providers) are able to function. He has some interesting insights from research on positive psychology on that score (see “How I Broke the Cycle of Stress”). But my (very nonexpert) advice is that this is a time to treat yourself and others very gently. It’s a time for nonjudgment, leeway for extra emotions, extra naps and extra ice cream. Whatever helps you feel less afraid, tired and lonely, do that. And do it again. Be well, my friends.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 31 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Whatever Helps You Feel Less Afraid, Tired and Lonely, Do That” in SA Mind Vol. 31 No. 3 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0520-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe