New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What's in Your Bacterial Aura?

Unmasking tiny denizens of the great indoors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One cool day in Eugene, Ore., James Meadow, in a tank top and shorts, climbed inside a sealed, sterilized chamber—a former refrigeration unit affectionately called the “pickle box.” The postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oregon's Biology and the Built Environment Center sat there for four hours, with no bathroom breaks, as 12 air filters collected the microorganisms emanating from his body.

“How much are humans giving off just sitting at the desk?” Meadow asks. He and his colleagues aim to find out.

The Oregon researchers keep tabs on what fills the air so they can design buildings that efficiently combine ventilation and filtration to surround occupants with the healthiest air possible. “If we're going to be constantly surrounded by bacteria,” Meadow says, “we may eventually get to a point where we can manage the indoor ecosystem the same way that we manage national parks.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Preliminary data from the pickle box show that the assays can detect the presence of a single human and are beginning to pick out individual differences. For now, Meadow says, the built environment is uncharted ecological territory: “We know more about the bacteria that you find in deep ocean vents, or in the troposphere, or in rocks in Antarctica.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Reading Your Bacterial Aura” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1113-16b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe