When Should You Have Your Prostate Checked?

Prostate cancer screening has become a controversial topic. You may have wondered why your doctor stopped screening you for it. Learn the pros and cons of prostate cancer screening and the risk factors associated with prostate cancer to help you decide whether or not to get screened

By House Call Doctor Sanaz Majd

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

There’s no doubt that female doctors are especially in demand. This is because women tend to search for female doctors.

But what about men? Do they tend to have a preference? I’ve heard both sides of the camp. I’d love to hear from you in your comments here or on my Facebook page.

Here's a not uncommon scenario when I see some of my brand new male patients for a physical exam:

“So do you have any concerns you wanted addressed today?” “My wife sees you, and she actually made me come in today. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be here. I don’t like doctors.” “When is the last time you had physical?” “Not sure. More than 10 years ago, I’d say” “Wow, that is quite a while. You’re not afraid of us, are you?” I say with a smile. Mind you, I’m the least intimidating-appearing physician you’ll ever meet at 5 feet tall with a petite frame.

“Well, to be honest, I’m not looking forward to that prostate exam.” “Oh, I see. You mean the rectal exam to feel the prostate surface?” “Yes.” “We don’t do it anymore.” “What?! You meant I was dreading this visit for no reason this whole time?” “Yes.”

It astounds me that many men are still unaware of this. Not unlike women who still believe that pap smears (tests for cervical cancer) are done annually (they’re not). If that is the only reason you dread the doctor, please fear no more. “Digital Rectal Exams” (or DRE) is no longer recommended as a routine screen, and I don’t know many up-to-date primary care physicians who still choose to do them. And neither is the blood PSA level (Prostate Specific Antigen).

Why don’t we screen for prostate cancer any longer? Some of you may be wondering why your doctor didn’t say anything about it and/or why your blood work didn’t include it. Read on for a synopsis of why this has now changed.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

»Continue reading on QuickAndDirtyTips.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American