When Small Numbers Lead to Big Errors

A statistician weighs in on the pitfalls of estimating the sizes of small groups

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As the U.S. military embarks on its review of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, to be delivered in a final report later this year, the question arises: How many service members are affected by the policy? To help answer that question, the Pentagon this past summer surveyed its troops, asking them if they served or had ever served with someone they believe to be gay. Leaving aside an obvious problem with the survey—that it is based on pure speculation—it also raises a common statistical challenge: asymmetry in population sizes. Because the vast majority of service members are heterosexual, many more straights will be misclassified as gays than vice versa.

This is a general problem in survey research. For example, Harvard University researcher David Hem­en­way has shown how some well-publicized studies have overestimated the number of guns used in the U.S. for self-defense by 10 times. Even if only 1 percent of respondents answer the survey incorrectly, the error is large compared with the proportion of the general population in any given year that uses guns in self-defense, which reasonable studies show to be about 0.1 percent.* In other words, the misclassification rate far exceeds the actual population size. To get around this problem, we would be wiser to trust surveys of crime victims, which restrict the gun use question to a smaller pool of subjects. 

As to our original question, a reasonable (though still imperfect) way to figure out what percentage of military service members are gay is by combining two estimates: the percentage of gays in the general population (easy enough to estimate from national surveys) and an estimate of the percentage of individuals in same-sex unmarried partner couples who report ever having served in the military (known as a probability). By extrapolating from the general population to service members, you are restricting your analysis to same-sex unmarried couples and thus narrowing the pool of potential false positives. Gary J. Gates of the University of California, Los Angeles, estimates using this method that 1.5 percent of men and 6.2 percent of women in the military are gay or bisexual.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


*Correction (10/19/10): This sentence was edited after posting. It originally stated that the 1 percent error is large compared with the proportion of the general population that owns guns for self-defense.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe