New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

When You Get Stuck Guessing, Relieve Stress

New insights into the psychological phenomenon called learned helplessness help in making strategies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes the best approach to problem solving is no strategy at all—an exploratory, “try anything” gambit. Such wild guessing can be a smart way to face a challenging competitor or explore unfamiliar terrain. Yet occasionally we get stuck in this random-guessing mode—we essentially keep pressing buttons with no thought to strategy. That is a phenomenon called learned helplessness, observable in people and animals who believe nothing they do can produce a desired outcome. Now scientists at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Janelia Research Campus in Ashburn, Va., have discovered the molecular switch that allows rats to flip between strategic and random behavior, a finding that could reveal how individual neural circuits contribute to decision making and provide clues for dealing with learned helplessness in humans.

To uncover the brain switch, biologist Alla Karpova and her colleagues challenged rats to compete against one of three computerized competitors. The competitors attempted to predict which of two holes the rats would poke their head through to earn a treat. The treat only appeared, however, if the computer failed to predict the rats' behavior. Against the first two competitors, the rats took a strategic approach and satisfied their sweet tooth. But the third competitor was devilishly capable, and the rats resorted to guessing. Then Karpova's team surreptitiously replaced the third competitor with one that rewarded a specific behavior pattern—something rats can usually figure out. Yet these rats floundered. They were stuck in random mode, insensitive to the cues that would have led to a reward. They never discovered the pattern after even thousands of attempts.

By manipulating levels of the stress hormone epinephrine, the researchers demonstrated that a part of the brain called the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)—a crescent of brain tissue behind the frontal lobes in humans—was key. When norepinephrine levels were high in the ACC, as they would be during stress, the rats abandoned strategic behavior. By suppressing norepinephrine in the ACC, Karpova's team was able to rescue rats stuck in random mode and restore their ability to learn from their mistakes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results jibe with earlier studies of learned helplessness in rats, which found that both exercise and antidepressants effectively eliminated the helpless behavior that often accompanies depression. These remedies are also known to relieve stress. “Because norepinephrine is regulated in stress, anything that lowers stress could help us behave strategically,” Karpova says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe