When You Get Stuck Guessing, Relieve Stress

New insights into the psychological phenomenon called learned helplessness help in making strategies

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes the best approach to problem solving is no strategy at all—an exploratory, “try anything” gambit. Such wild guessing can be a smart way to face a challenging competitor or explore unfamiliar terrain. Yet occasionally we get stuck in this random-guessing mode—we essentially keep pressing buttons with no thought to strategy. That is a phenomenon called learned helplessness, observable in people and animals who believe nothing they do can produce a desired outcome. Now scientists at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Janelia Research Campus in Ashburn, Va., have discovered the molecular switch that allows rats to flip between strategic and random behavior, a finding that could reveal how individual neural circuits contribute to decision making and provide clues for dealing with learned helplessness in humans.

To uncover the brain switch, biologist Alla Karpova and her colleagues challenged rats to compete against one of three computerized competitors. The competitors attempted to predict which of two holes the rats would poke their head through to earn a treat. The treat only appeared, however, if the computer failed to predict the rats' behavior. Against the first two competitors, the rats took a strategic approach and satisfied their sweet tooth. But the third competitor was devilishly capable, and the rats resorted to guessing. Then Karpova's team surreptitiously replaced the third competitor with one that rewarded a specific behavior pattern—something rats can usually figure out. Yet these rats floundered. They were stuck in random mode, insensitive to the cues that would have led to a reward. They never discovered the pattern after even thousands of attempts.

By manipulating levels of the stress hormone epinephrine, the researchers demonstrated that a part of the brain called the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)—a crescent of brain tissue behind the frontal lobes in humans—was key. When norepinephrine levels were high in the ACC, as they would be during stress, the rats abandoned strategic behavior. By suppressing norepinephrine in the ACC, Karpova's team was able to rescue rats stuck in random mode and restore their ability to learn from their mistakes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results jibe with earlier studies of learned helplessness in rats, which found that both exercise and antidepressants effectively eliminated the helpless behavior that often accompanies depression. These remedies are also known to relieve stress. “Because norepinephrine is regulated in stress, anything that lowers stress could help us behave strategically,” Karpova says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe