New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Where Are They Now?

The stories of Westinghouse--now Intel--Science Talent Search finalists. From chemistry to code-breaking, genetics to geology, some of these scientifically precocious young men and women have gone on to win Nobel Prizes--and all of them live fascinating lives

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Since 1942 the science talent search first sponsored by Westinghouse, and later by the Intel Corporation, has launched approximately 2,500 young finalists and winners into the national limelight.

Every year, we marvel at these high school students' projects. Some prove mathematical theorems. Some develop potential new cancer detection techniques. We wonder what amazing things these precocious young people will do with their lives.

The "Where are they now?" column seeks to answer this question. Some have won Nobel Prizes, whereas others have become MacArthur Fellows. Most simply lead interesting lives that show the breadth of careers open to people who learn about problem-solving early on, and the joys and challenges of building a knowledge-based career.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Once a week, we'll profile past winners and finalists of all different ages and in different fields. This week, as another of Intel's projects, the International Science and Engineering Fair, gets underway in Atlanta, we'll highlight three past finalists, and we'll be on hand at the festival to blog from it live as students present their work and wait eagerly to see who's won.

We invite past Westinghouse and Intel Science Talent Search winners and finalists to contact us to participate in this series.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe