New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Where There's Smoke, There's Climate Change

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To anyone who has ever seen a forest fire in action or the eerie, charred landscape left in its wake, the ground-level damage is devastatingly clear. More difficult to assess has been what transpires in the atmosphere as a result of biomass burning. New research suggests that the atmospheric effects of these blazes are profound, and may significantly impact climate on regional and continental scales.

Findings from two studies of smoke pollution from forest burning in the Amazon are detailed in the current issue of the journal Science. In the first paper, Meinrat O. Andreae of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, and his colleagues report that in cases of heavy pollution, smoke suppresses rainfall, allowing the aerosols to penetrate the upper levels of the atmosphere. As a result, the clouds appear to smoke. Ultimately, the smoke aerosols can alter the amount of radiation reaching the earth and encourage long-distance transportation of the smoke. And when the aerosol- and water-laden clouds eventually release their precipitation, they generate intense thunderstorms and large hail instead of the usual moderate rainfall. "The invigorated storms release the latent heat higher in the atmosphere," the authors write. "This should substantially affect the regional and global circulation systems."

In the second study, a team led by Ilan Koren of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center analyzed satellite data from the Amazon during the dry season and found that scattered cumulus-cloud coverage fell from 38 percent when the air was clean to zero in heavy smoke conditions. The incoming heat resulting from this reduction in cloud cover, they say, can swamp the cooling effects of the scattering of solar radiation by the smoke particles. This, the researchers conclude, may help explain "why Earth warmed substantially in the last century despite the expected aerosol cooling effect." --Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe