Whiskers Help Seals to Navigate and Hunt for Prey

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Courtsey of GUIDO DEHNHARDT, University of Bochum, Germany

Marine mammals are often forced to find food in dark or turbid waters, where visibility is greatly reduced. Some creatures, such as dolphins, resort to echolocation. But others¿among them seals¿lack that ability. Now researchers at the University of Bonn and Ruhr-Universit¿t Bochum in Germany have discovered how seals locate prey when they can't see: they follow their whiskers.

In a study published in today's Science, Guido Dehnhardt and his colleagues used two trained male harbor seals¿named Henry (right) and Nick¿to show that a seal's whiskers are sensitive to the trails left behind swimming objects, such as fish, over long distances.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists first trained both seals to locate a small propeller-driven submarine. At the start of the experiment, they blindfolded the seals, covered their ears with earphones and held their heads above water as the submarine traveled underwater. When the submarine engine switched off, they removed only the seals' earphones, signaling to them to begin their search.

In a pool filled with naturally turbid seawater, Henry found and directly followed the submarine's trail almost 80 percent of the time. When his whiskers were covered with a stocking mask, though, he was unable to locate the submarine at all. Nick, who was in a freshwater pool, had a similar overall success rate and also failed to locate the submarine when his whiskers were covered. The results suggest that whiskers, and not visual or audible clues, lead seals to their prey.

The scientists propose that seals may be able to detect a swimming herring that is more than 335 feet away. "However, for a reliable estimate," they write, "we need to learn more about background noise in the wild as well as the aging of fish-generated trails under natural conditions."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe