White Dwarf Acts as Cosmic Magnifying Glass

A planet-hunting telescope has observed long-predicted gravitational lensing of a star in a binary system by its companion

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have observed a white dwarf acting as a magnifying glass for another, Sun-like star that it is orbiting. The binary star system, 808 parsecs (2,600 light years) away from Earth in the constellation Lyra, was previously classified as a possible exoplanet system. Using data from NASA’s Kepler spacecraft, physicists Ethan Kruse and Eric Agol of the University of Washington in Seattle observed an increase of just 0.1% in the larger star's brightness every 88 days, lasting for 5 hours. They say that the effect is the result of an orbiting white dwarf — a dense, compact, burnt-out star whose gravitational effects act as a magnifying glass every time it crosses the line of sight between its companion star and Earth. Kruse and Agol publish their findings in Science today.

Massive bodies are known to distort space-time and bend the path of light travelling past them. The phenomenon, called gravitational lensing, was first predicted by Albert Einstein in 1915. The body acts as a lens and can cause viewers to see multiple images of objects behind it. For objects that appear very small because they are so far from the viewer, such as the Sun-like star, the multiple images cannot be distinguished, but astronomers expect to see the effects of lensing as an increase in the star's overall brightness.

The ‘self-lensing’ effect in a binary system was predicted 40 years ago by Swiss astronomer André Maeder, but had not been seen until now. “It was not till Kepler was launched that we had a telescope capable of finding such tiny changes,” says Kruse.

The system, officially named Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) 3278, was originally classed as a candidate exoplanet because Kepler also saw a regular dimming in its light that could be explained by an orbiting planet passing in front of it. In fact, the dimming happens when the white dwarf, which gives out light of its own, passes behind its much larger companion, say the authors.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 17, 2014.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe