New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

White Dwarf Acts as Cosmic Magnifying Glass

A planet-hunting telescope has observed long-predicted gravitational lensing of a star in a binary system by its companion

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have observed a white dwarf acting as a magnifying glass for another, Sun-like star that it is orbiting. The binary star system, 808 parsecs (2,600 light years) away from Earth in the constellation Lyra, was previously classified as a possible exoplanet system. Using data from NASA’s Kepler spacecraft, physicists Ethan Kruse and Eric Agol of the University of Washington in Seattle observed an increase of just 0.1% in the larger star's brightness every 88 days, lasting for 5 hours. They say that the effect is the result of an orbiting white dwarf — a dense, compact, burnt-out star whose gravitational effects act as a magnifying glass every time it crosses the line of sight between its companion star and Earth. Kruse and Agol publish their findings in Science today.

Massive bodies are known to distort space-time and bend the path of light travelling past them. The phenomenon, called gravitational lensing, was first predicted by Albert Einstein in 1915. The body acts as a lens and can cause viewers to see multiple images of objects behind it. For objects that appear very small because they are so far from the viewer, such as the Sun-like star, the multiple images cannot be distinguished, but astronomers expect to see the effects of lensing as an increase in the star's overall brightness.

The ‘self-lensing’ effect in a binary system was predicted 40 years ago by Swiss astronomer André Maeder, but had not been seen until now. “It was not till Kepler was launched that we had a telescope capable of finding such tiny changes,” says Kruse.

The system, officially named Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) 3278, was originally classed as a candidate exoplanet because Kepler also saw a regular dimming in its light that could be explained by an orbiting planet passing in front of it. In fact, the dimming happens when the white dwarf, which gives out light of its own, passes behind its much larger companion, say the authors.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 17, 2014.

Elizabeth Gibney is a senior physics reporter for Nature magazine.

More by Elizabeth Gibney

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe