White Dwarf Shooting through Space May Have Left a 'Stellar' Contrail

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Peter McCullough at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Robert Benjamin at the University of Wisconsin at Madison may have witnessed the first example of a trail left by a white dwarf star shooting through interstellar space¿something astronomers predicted in the early 1980s. The Y-shaped filament, which resembles a jet contrail, measures about 2.5 degrees in length. It was first spotted near the Big Dipper in Ursa Major in 1997, and the researchers suspect the trail is approximately 300 light-years from Earth. They reported their finding in the September issue of theAstronomical Journal.

"We believe the gas trail was produced by the radiation from a white dwarf or some other low-luminosity source zipping through the local interstellar medium and leaving behind an ionized wake," McCullough says. "The problem is that we have not yet identified the source." White dwarf stars, though much bigger than planets, appear very faint. Still, McCullough notes that "the filament's large angular size also suggests it is nearby, and therefore we should be able to identify what created it. The culprit could be sitting right under our noses and we don't recognize it."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American