White House Goes Big on Microbiome Research

US government and private investors team up for proposed half-a-billion-dollar effort to study Earth's microbes

Micrococcus Luteus

Photo By BSIP/UIG Via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The US government is launching a new effort to study the vast, and mostly invisible, array of microbes that thrive in the human body and across ecosystems.

The US$121-million National Microbiome Initiative (NMI) will attempt to map and investigate these collections of microorganisms over the next two years, with help from multiple federal agencies, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) said today.

Private investors will contribute another $400 million to the effort over several years. Among them is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which will spend $100 million over four years on nutrition and pest control programmes in developing countries, and several research institutions that will examine microbes' role in subjects such as cancer therapeutics and marine microbiology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists' interest in microbiomes has grown in recent years. Improvements in genome-sequencing, imaging and computing tools have begun to reveal the breadth of microorganisms' influence on areas such as human healthfood production and climate change.

Yet much about Earth's microbiomes is unknown, says Tim Donohue, a bacteriologist at the University of Wisconsin in Madison and director of the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center. "I think we know how to figure out who's there," he says. "But we don’t have the tools to generate the knowledge about what they’re doing and how their activities benefit ecosystems or are detrimental to ecosystems."

Funding fight

The White House project still faces a major hurdle: convincing Congress to approve the full funding proposed by the White House. Its plan for the initiative rests on lawmakers approving the bulk of the NMI's funding as part of the government's fiscal year 2017 budget.

But the Republican lawmakers who control the House of Representatives and the Senate have generally not supported US President Barack Obama's initiatives. And they may be especially reluctant to devote more money to research on microbes’ role in alternative energy and climate change.

“I think it’s going to be a fight,” says Stefano Bertuzzi, director of the American Society of Microbiology in Washington DC.

Under the White House plan, the US Department of Agriculture, which is interested in how soil microbes affect crops and animals, is proposing nearly $24 million for the effort. The National Institutes of Health hopes to add $20 million to the hundreds of millions that it already spends to understand the role that microbes play in infectious disease and conditions such as obesity and mental health. And the National Science Foundation proposes to spend about $16 million to fund a wide variety of microbiome research.

Also joining in are the Department of Energy, which plans to spend $10 million on interests such as the potential for producing biofuels, and NASA, which is interested in searching for extraplanetary life and how microbes affect humans in space.

Few, if any, science initiatives have included so many different government agencies, Bertuzzi says. “The Da Vinci who can summarize all the expertise needed is no longer the case because it’s gotten so complicated and so specialized,” he says. “That’s why we need initiatives like this.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on May 13, 2016.

Sara Reardon is a freelance biomedical journalist based in Bozeman, Mont. She is a former staff reporter at Nature, New Scientist and Science and has a master’s degree in molecular biology.

More by Sara Reardon

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe