White Printing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A correspondent writing to US- from Washington, D. C, gives it as his opinion that if books and papers were printed with white ink on black or dark colored paper, reading would not be so injurious to the eyes as it is at present. He says :—" The great flare which is reflected from the white pages distresses the delicate organ of vision, and interferes with the prompt transmission of the reflected letters to the retina." Our attention was directed to the same subject, about two years ago, by a California correspondent, and published in a former volume. We are not inclined to adopt the opinion of our correspondent, especially as it regards paper with a black ground and white ink. If in reading, the eyes have to recognize a hundred letters per minute, the rays of light must be both absorbed and reflected a hundred times in that period. The eye is, therefore, subject to severe labor in reading, not on account of the white reflected light from the paper, but frequent intermittent absorption and reflection of light. This accounts for the effect called "dazzling," which is produced by looking for a very brief period on a piece of white and black checked cloth, the stripes of which are very fine, and of equal breadth— the black stripes absorb, and the white reflect the rays of light. SOMETHING USEFUL.—Francis & Loutrel, No. 45 Maiden Lane, are extensive manufacturers of stationery of all kinds. They have a very large assortment of memorandum books for the year; also every style of account-book; writing paper ; copying, seal and card presses; manifold letter writers, fancy and staple stationery.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 18This article was published with the title “White Printing” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 18 (), p. 144
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01091858-144c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe