Who Killed YouTube on the iPhone--Apple or Google?

Did Apple kick YouTube to the curb, or did Google have a part in its disappearance from iOS? (Credit: Screenshot by Ben Parr/CNET) YouTube will no longer come standard on the iPhone and iPad , and the Internet is jumping to conclusions as usual.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Did Apple kick YouTube to the curb, or did Google have a part in its disappearance from iOS?

(Credit:

Screenshot by Ben Parr/CNET)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


YouTube will no longer come standard on the iPhone and iPad, and the Internet is jumping to conclusions as usual.

The next version of Apple's mobile OS -- iOS 6 -- will be missing the familiar YouTube app from its home screen. Instead, users will have to download a new YouTube app from the App Store. Apple claims it's simply because its five-year deal with Google has expired, while Google isn't even talking about the circumstances of YouTube's departure from Apple's devices.

Apple and Google don't exactly like each other, and Apple has been systematically purging Google's influence from its flagship OS. Earlier this year, Apple announced that iOS 6 will remove Google Maps in favor of Apple Maps.

That's why everyone seems to be concluding that YouTube's disappearance from iOS is all Apple's fault. It fits the pattern, after all. And people are understandably upset:

Apple killing YouTube on iPhone just happens to be the last straw. Went into the AT&T store today to begin switch to my Android phone.

-- Jeff Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) August 7, 2012

I'm upset too. YouTube is a huge reason why I got an iPhone in the first place, but I actually think this move is for the best. For the past five years, Apple -- not Google -- has been the sole developer of the YouTube iOS app. Yes, that's right -- Google had nothing to do with its development. This was the price it had to pay for five years of prominent placement on the iPhone.

Now that Google is in charge of the YouTube app again, I suspect it will become a lot faster, smarter, and feature-rich. On the downside, it will probably come with an array of advertising that it couldn't previously serve to millions of iPhone users.

Advertising is the reason why I'm not indicting Apple for the crime of kicking YouTube to the curb. As part of Google's five-year deal with Apple, Google was not allowed to run any kind of advertising on the YouTube app. There was no way it could deliver ads -- Apple controlled the app. Now that the deal has expired, Google is finally free to monetize millions of mobile eyeballs and cat videos.

Here's the truth: both sides wanted this deal to end. Apple wanted to purge itself of Google's influence from its devices, and Google wanted to run ads. Now both sides will get what they wanted all along.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe