New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Who Said Quitters Never Win?

If at first you don't succeed, quit—for your future health

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some people stop at nothing to get what they want, persisting in the face of continual hardship. Often seen as a sign of strength, this behavior may also be indicative of future illness, according to a new study.

Psychologists asked 90 adolescent girls about their tendency to hold on to unattainable goals. Over the next year, they found that the girls who said they never gave up had more quickly increasing blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) as compared with the girls who were moderately good at letting go. High levels of CRP often precede the development of heart disease, cancer and diabetes. And although CRP levels are expected to rise over time, the faster rate of increase in people who persevere relentlessly could give them an elevated risk for illness later in life.

The researchers are not sure exactly how the rising CRP levels translate into future health problems, but they are confident that further investigation will tease out the connection. The more difficult part is figuring out when to give up on a goal, says study author Gregory Miller, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia. “It's like that Kenny Rogers song: you've got to know when to fold them,” he says. “But it's really hard to know.”

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Who Said Quitters Never Win?” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 6 (), p. 7
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-7a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe