Who Said Quitters Never Win?

If at first you don't succeed, quit—for your future health

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some people stop at nothing to get what they want, persisting in the face of continual hardship. Often seen as a sign of strength, this behavior may also be indicative of future illness, according to a new study.

Psychologists asked 90 adolescent girls about their tendency to hold on to unattainable goals. Over the next year, they found that the girls who said they never gave up had more quickly increasing blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) as compared with the girls who were moderately good at letting go. High levels of CRP often precede the development of heart disease, cancer and diabetes. And although CRP levels are expected to rise over time, the faster rate of increase in people who persevere relentlessly could give them an elevated risk for illness later in life.

The researchers are not sure exactly how the rising CRP levels translate into future health problems, but they are confident that further investigation will tease out the connection. The more difficult part is figuring out when to give up on a goal, says study author Gregory Miller, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia. “It's like that Kenny Rogers song: you've got to know when to fold them,” he says. “But it's really hard to know.”

SA Mind Vol 18 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Who Said Quitters Never Win?” in SA Mind Vol. 18 No. 6 (), p. 7
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1207-7a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe