Whole Lotta Shakin' on Asteroid Itokawa

Pooled pebbles point to repeated rattling

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Did James Bond order an asteroid? Because researchers have one he might approve of: Tiny pebbles on the near-Earth asteroid Itokawa show signs of being repeatedly shaken.

Researchers report that millimeter- to pea-size rocks have pooled in three troughs on the asteroid's surface, suggesting that the grains flowed downhill like potato chip crumbs falling to the bottom of the bag. Although the true cause of the pooling is unclear, repeated shaking can make smaller rocks slide by allowing them to work their way around larger ones.

The finding implies that "things are happening even on this little cluster of rock," says space researcher Daniel Scheeres of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. "There are geological processes at work."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The observation comes from close-up photos of Itokawa snapped by the Japanese space probe Hayabusa, which touched down on the asteroid twice in November 2005. Researchers are scrutinizing those images as they await Hayabusa's return with hoped-for samples of Itokawan dirt.

The asteroid is essentially an oblong clod of rocks less than 500 meters across. Its gravity is weaker than Earth's by a factor of more than 5,000, so even collisions from centimeter-size rocks would be enough to rattle the whole asteroid and cause the rocks on its surface to jump, according to a paper by Scheeres and co-workers published online this week in Science.

"Itokawa is a natural laboratory for granules to be shaken under microgravity," says the report's lead author, researcher Hideaki Miyamoto of the University of Tokyo and the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Ariz.

But Scheeres notes that other effects could be dragging rocks downhill, including variations in the asteroid's gravity as it passed near Earth or during a possible earlier phase in which the asteroid consisted of two pieces orbiting one another.

In other signs of downhill movement, the pea-size grains tended to point sideways, as though they had been rolling, and boulders had clusters of the small ones piled behind them, implying that big rocks blocked the movement of smaller ones.

Given the asteroid's weak gravity, the apparent movement of its rocks is "pretty striking," says granular materials researcher Robert Behringer of Duke University.

"The method of shaking is rather novel," he says, compared with earthly phenomena such as the so-called "Brazil nut effect," in which larger nuts rise to the top of a shaken can of mixed nuts. "You don't imagine shaking the whole Earth when you're shaking your can of nuts."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe