New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Why Autism Strikes More Boys Than Girls

A gene that interacts with sex hormones may explain the gender gap

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Autism, a developmental disorder that causes deficits in social behavior and communication, affects four times as many boys as girls. Because of this extreme gender imbalance, some scientists posit that sex hormones may contribute to the disease. Now researchers have identified for the first time a gene that may help explain the gender discrepancy and underlie some common autism symptoms.

In 2010 biologist Valerie Hu of the George Washington University Medical Center and her colleagues found that brains of people with autism have low levels of a protein produced by a gene called retinoic acid–related orphan receptor-alpha (RORA). Now they report in a study published in PLoS ONE on February 16 that this gene interacts with certain types of estrogen and testosterone found in the brain.

Hu and her team examined neural cells in their lab. They found that RORA controls the production of an enzyme called arom­a­tase, which converts testosterone to estrogen. But in their tests, the presence of tes­tosterone made RORA less active, leading to a decline in arom­atase and a buildup of even more testoster­one. Estrogen had the opposite effect. In a typical brain the balance of sex hormones regulates RORA activity and keeps hormone levels steady, but any imbalance can be exacerbated by this loop.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Next, the researchers confirmed that brain tissue from donors who had autism indeed contains low amounts of the RORA protein and aromatase. The authors suggest that a deficiency in these molecules causes the chemical loop to spiral out of control, resulting in an accumulation of tes­tosterone that may cause autism. In most females, higher levels of estrogen could be protecting them from the disorder.

In addition to the gender bias, RORA might be implicated in the abnormal routines that characterize autism. For in­stance, mice that lack this gene fixate on objects and show limited exploratory behavior, similar to individuals with autism. “I don’t think any single gene is going to explain all of the pathology associated with autism, but RORA does explain quite a few of them,” Hu says.

SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Why Autism Strikes More Boys Than Girls” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 3 (), p. 11
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0711-11b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe