Scientists Get Wind of Why Coasts Cool as the Globe Warms

Climatic conundrum may help the Los Angeles Basin and California's wine country dodge a bullet as the world warms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A group of northern California scientists have found a new bend in the Gordian knot of global warming: coastal cooling.

The team, headed by meteorologist Robert Bornstein of San Jose State University, has found that as temperatures rise in California, so do pressure differences that control cool Pacific winds. That means higher temperatures inland create lower ones at the coast.

"It's not that the whole Earth is warming like an oven," Bornstein says. "Different parts are warming at different rates, therefore the pressure patterns are upset—and therefore the wind patterns are upset."

Bornstein, along with colleagues Jorge Gonzalez and Bereket Lebassi, both of Santa Clara State University, separated historic temperature data for California into smaller groups by factors such as region, time of day and time of year. By comparing the data, they found that daytime summer highs have been dropping at the coast because of cooling higher winds.

The research is part of a growing trend of examining smaller areas to fill in the wider picture of global warming. Wind is a good example: In this case it is lowering temps by bringing cooler air from the ocean; in other instances, it may bring hotter, dryer desert air to the U.S. Southwest; or change the cloud cover over the Pacific Northwest; or shift rain patterns in the nation's South. These smaller scale snapshots are creating a complex and nuanced image of how warming will affect the country —and the world.

Bornstein says the findings bode well for California's wine regions and the Los Angeles Basin, because they indicate that those areas may be spared the worst of climate change. But this also means the rest of  the state may end up hotter than expected in 30 years (and probably already are, because cooler coasts have been dragging down the average) if nothing is done to address the causes of global warming.

The study is currently being reviewed to appear in the Journal of Climate.

Climatologist Stephen Schneider, of nearby Stanford University praised the research but disagrees with the conclusions.

"I thought his extrapolation beyond meteorology into the world of climate impacts was wrong," he says. "For him to say that L.A. doesn't have to worry about heat waves—as well as Napa—is just wrong."

Schneider says the key is not daily highs but, rather, extreme highs. He says grapes are damaged and people suffer heat exhaustion and/or stroke mostly on just a few sizzling days during the summer. These are the days where either the wind comes from the east, or does not blow at all. And it is not likely that these days are decreasing, which means slightly cooler days will not make a difference.

"It might help with the air conditioning bill," he says. "Instead of it being 85 in the afternoon, it's 83. That's nice. What I'm worried about is when it's 106, as it was this year, in the future couple decades it will be 108."

Bornstein says he plans to do more research to determine the wind's cooling mechanism. That is, whether the winds have become more frequent, intense and colder—or whether they simply penetrate further inland, cooling more acreage. He also plans to look for a similar effect along the U.S. eastern seaboard.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe