Why do our eyes have a peak spectral response of only about 550 nanometers?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Albert O. Edwards, an assistant professor of ophthalmology at UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and an expert on macular degeneration, provides this explanation:

Image: St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Institute
FOVEA, located at the back of the eye (blue arrow), is responsible for fine-detail vision. It contains pigments that absorb light at a maximum wavelength of 550 nanometers.

Among other functions, our eyes convert electromagnetic radiation in the form of light into electrical signals that can be interpreted by our brain. This process involves special cells called photoreceptors in the retina. These cells capture packets of light, called photons, and issue first a chemical and ultimately an electrical signal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Photoreceptors come in two main types. Rod photoreceptors contain a pigment that absorbs dim light and leads to black-and-white images. Cone photoreceptors allow for color vision. They come in three types--each of which has a slightly different pigment that responds to a different wavelength of light, either red, blue or green. The colors we perceive depend on which photoreceptors are activated. People who are colorblind cannot detect some hues because they lack a certain type of retinal cone.

When the pigments absorb the light, proteins bound to them change their conformation. This change in the protein's shape prompts the chemical signal cascade, called visual transduction, that then triggers an electrical signal to the brain. The sensitivity of the part of the retina responsible for fine vision (the fovea) contains pigments that absorb light at a maximum wavelength of about 550 nanometers. Thus, 550 nanometers marks the upper limit for our spectral response.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe