Why Humans Are So Thirsty

Artificial proteins, carbon-sucking rocks, particle accelerators, and more

Scientific American, July 2021

Scientific American, July 2021

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I apologize in advance, but our cover story on human water needs might make you thirsty. I’ve been thinking of it every time I take a drink! We humans are weird animals in a lot of ways, but one of the weirdest is that we’re really bad, physiologically, at staying hydrated. In fact, we are more dependent on water than most other mammals. As biologist Asher Y. Rosinger explains, some of our most distinctive technologies, from clay pots to aqueducts to desalination plants, were developed to let us survive and thrive when and where water is scarce.

One of the great joys of studying, reading about or writing about science is that there’s always something new and mind-bending to learn. The abbreviation “TIL” for “today I learned” is a way to celebrate and share that joy. People use it a lot on social media to introduce some bit of knowledge that delighted them, even if it’s been known for a while and other people might judge them for having learned it just today. It’s such a nice sign of humility and enthusiasm, the opposite of “duh, everybody knows that.” The fact that humans are so thirsty is just one of the things I learned while reviewing this month’s issue.

TIL: The most common state of matter in our universe is plasma. This ionized gas is the fourth state of matter, one we encounter in our daily lives a lot less than solids, liquids or more familiar gases. But plasma is the main ingredient in stars and is most of what exists outside our planet, as well as in some new types of particle accelerators. Electrical engineering professor Chandrashekhar Joshi is developing these tools with the aim of revealing new fundamental physics.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Rock from Earth’s mantle pokes up through the crust in only a few places, including Canada, California, Japan, New Zealand and Oman. A mantle rock called peridotite reacts with water and air once it’s exposed, sucking out carbon dioxide and petrifying it—a lot of it—in newly created minerals. Some geologists estimate that Oman’s rocks could make a big dent in greenhouse gases if this natural process is accelerated, as journalist Douglas Fox reports. Controlling the climate crisis will require many different solutions, and this one is on the verge of scaling up.

Some of the techniques to reverse or prevent soil erosion are also climate solutions, as biologist and science policy expert Jo Handelsman describes. She shares a quick, smart, achievable list of farming, fertilizing and grazing practices that would benefit food producers as well as the planet. Would you pay extra for food that’s labeled for improving carbon storage in the soil? I gladly pay a small premium for coffee grown in bird-friendly conditions, so I’m sure I’d look for that label.

The science of manipulating and even fashioning new proteins is blazing right now, sped up (as much research has been) by the COVID pandemic. In a thrilling story starting here, writer Rowan Jacobsen shows us the race to create better vaccines that could stimulate the immune system more efficiently than the current versions and even prepare our bodies to resist new coronavirus variants. In the photographs for this story, the confident, determined scientists behind this research seem to be saying, “We’ve got this.”

Our final story started with the images. Photographer Grant Delin was amazed by the efficiency and emotion of the vaccine clinic where he got his own COVID vaccine. He teamed up with writer and Scientific American contributing editor Robin Lloyd to capture the drama of people experiencing the most important (and speediest) biomedical achievement of our lifetimes.

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Thirst for Knowledge” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 1 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0721-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe