Why Is Our Universe 3-D?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When a brane and antibrane meet, they do not annihilate directly to energy. Instead they first fragment into shards. These shards are smaller branes and antibranes; they occupy two fewer dimensions than the original ones did. For instance, if the initial brane and antibrane spanned seven spatial dimensions (a D7-brane and antibrane), they fragment into many D5-branes and antibranes. These shards, in turn, annihilate into D3-branes and antibranes and thence into D1-branes. Only at that point do they vanish altogether.

The cascade of brane-antibrane annihilation tends to remove large branes, which easily find their antibrane doppelgangers and so annihilate. Smaller branes, such as the D3 and D1 varieties, have greater difficulty bumping into antibranes in the vastness of nine-dimensional space. Lisa Randall of Harvard University and Andreas Karch of the University of Washington generalized our results to include nine expanding dimensions. This process may help explain why most branes, like ours, tend to have fairly few dimensions.

—C.B. and F.Q.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe