Why isn't the dual wave/particle nature of the quantum mechanical world present in the macroscopic world (say, for a basketball)?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Joseph S. Merola, associate dean for research at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, responds.

There are several different ways of approaching this question, but I won't beat around the bush. The simple answer is that wave/particle duality, as it is called, is present in the macroscopic world--but we can't see it.

Scientists have developed a number of indirect methods for observing wave/particle duality. One of the earliest experiments showed that a regular array of atoms could diffract an electron beam. Because diffraction is a property of a wave, this test indicated that particles--electrons in this case--could also behave as waves.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The physicist Louis deBroglie proved that any particle in motion has a wave-like nature. He developed the following relationship: the wavelength of a particle's wave aspect is equal to Planck's constant divided by the momentum of the particle.

Now, most of the objects that we encounter have incredibly large masses compared with atomic and sub-atomic particles, which can give them a relatively huge momentum. For example, if you calculate the wavelength of a one-pound basketball traveling at one foot per second (I hope the purists will forgive my use of units, but they work out quite well in this case), you will find that it has a wavelength of around 10-34 meters. This wavelength is incredibly small--too small, in fact, to measure using modern instrumentation.

An electron, though, is less massive than our basketball by a factor of about 1030. So, an electron traveling at the same speed as our basketball has a wavelength of some 10-4 meters, which is quite measurable. Thus, we can determine the wavelength of very small particles, but not of large macroscopic items such as basketballs.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe