New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why Did So Much High-Profile Junk Fall from Space Last Year?

Orbital debris hits Earth daily, but NASA says not to worry

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Two well-publicized satellite falls a month apart got me wondering: Is this the new normal? After all, there is plenty of junk in orbit, and it can’t stay up there forever. And NASA, along with many other space agencies, now requires that satellites tumble back to Earth sooner rather than later once their useful lifetimes have ended so as to limit collisions in orbit. So how often are we going to be hearing about inbound satellites—and worrying about the ever so slim chance that they might kill us? A call to ­NASA’s top orbital debris scientist clarified the issue and reassured me that we are not now witnessing the leading edge of a debris storm.

But first a brief recap. In September, ­NASA’s defunct Upper Atmosphere Re-­search Satellite, or UARS, came streaking back into Earth’s atmosphere. UARS returned to Earth uncontrolled, meaning that NASA and the U.S. military could only guess where the pieces might land. Ulti­mately UARS did the world a favor and plunked itself down in the remote South Pacific, out of harm’s way. Just a month later Germany’s smaller ROSAT spacecraft followed suit, diving back to Earth over the Bay of Bengal. Again the fall proved benign.

Neither event, as it turns out, was all that rare. Pieces of space junk, whether derelict spacecraft, rocket bodies or other mission by-products, fall from orbit more or less daily.  UARS turned so many heads because it “was the biggest NASA satellite to reenter uncon­trolled in over 30 years,” says Nicholas Johnson, NASA’s chief scientist for orbital debris at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. And ROSAT came with a relatively high debris risk because of its construction.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But UARS-size objects belonging to other space-faring agencies fall from orbit roughly once a year; ROSAT-size junk is even more common. Humankind has survived dec­ades of reentries without significant incident, thanks to the fact that most of Earth is ocean or sparsely populated land. “Reentries are very, very routine,” Johnson says. And rules enacted since the launch of UARS are help­ing to ensure our safety. Engineers now “de­sign for demise” when building space­craft, swapping out materials that survive reentry.  

Johnson and his colleagues keep a list of all NASA objects in orbit, including an estimate of when those objects will make the fiery plunge into the atmosphere. Two huge ones on the books are the Hubble Space Telescope and the International Space Station. The plan with both is to use thrusters to drive the craft into the ocean when their time comes. 

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Why Did So Much High-Profile Junk Fall from Space Last Year?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012012-4KEVx4tRo0F2J5OPHAu2dk

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe