New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Why Screams Are So Upsetting

Rapid fluctuations in volume—mimicked by sirens—trigger the brain’s fear centers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If there is one sound that bettered our ancestors' chances of survival, it might be the scream. When a baby needs food, it hollers; if a ravenous lion prowls a little too close, a blood-curdling shriek alerts the tribe. Yet from an acoustic standpoint, screams—and how our brain processes the sound—have been largely overlooked by researchers, until now. A study published in July in Current Biology found that screams are sonically unique in a way that perfectly captures our attention.

By analyzing screams culled from YouTube videos, films and volunteer shriekers, researchers led by neuroscientist David Poeppel, who runs a language-processing laboratory at New York University, found that screams occupy a dedicated position on the auditory spectrum. Specifically, what sets them apart from other human vocalizations is how fast they change in loudness. Normal speech has only slight variations in loudness—changing at a rate of just four to five times per second—whereas screams violently clamor through our vocal cords varying in volume 30 to 150 times per second. This rapid, large variation is too fast to be perceived consciously as volume changes; instead it results in what is called roughness, a certain startling discordance in sound that the human brain associates with fear. To this end, Poeppel and his colleagues used functional MRI to show that increases in roughness raise the activation of the amygdala, the brain's fear and emotion center.

Roughness is what allows screams to outcompete other sounds. Plenty of things are loud—jet engines, for example. Yet a wailing five-year-old tends to cut through the roar and grab our attention. The unique spectral qualities of screams are also thought to reduce the incidence of false alarms from other loud but nonrough sounds. Incidentally, it turns out engineers have—knowingly or not—been taking advantage of roughness for decades: as Poeppel's work shows, most sirens and alarms also oscillate in loudness in the same wide, chaotic frequency pattern as screams do.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Poeppel plans on exploring next whether or not infant screams have the same roughness patterns as adult ones. He also hopes to look for correlates in the animal world. “Screams are arguably the oldest vocalizations,” he says, “so understanding more about their properties illuminates fundamental features of the mind and brain.”

Bret Stetka was a writer based in New York City and editorial director of Medscape Neurology (a subsidiary of WebMD). His work appeared in Wired, NPR and the Atlantic. He graduated from the University of Virginia School of Medicine in 2005. Stetka died in 2022.

More by Bret Stetka
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Why Screams Are So Startling” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 6 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1115-9a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe