Why Some Mice Seem to Make Bad Parents

 A single gene is linked to nest building in mice

Nurturing nesters: oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus) make good parents.

Andrés Bendesky and Hopi Hoekstra

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some wild mice are diligent parents, building elaborate grassy nests to keep their young safe and warm. Others are less attentive and construct shoddier homes for their offspring. Researchers recently identified a gene that regulates nest building—one of only a few genes known to affect parental behavior in mammals, including humans.

In a study published in Nature, geneticist Andrés Bendesky of Harvard University and his colleagues worked with two kinds of mice that are genetically similar but differ in their pairing behavior: a subspecies of oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus) form monogamous pairs, whereas deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) mate with multiple partners. They also parent differently. Oldfield mice build more elaborate nests than their promiscuous counterparts, and they spend more time grooming and huddling with their pups, as well as retrieving stray ones. In the study, these parenting behaviors did not depend on the care that the mice received as babies—when pups of one species were fostered by parents of the other species, they still grew up to mimic their biological parents' nurturing habits.

In search of a genetic basis for these parental behaviors, Bendesky and his colleagues crossbred the two types of mice twice to yield nearly 800 grandpups. Among the second-generation offspring, one gene linked to nest building stood out—it regulates the hormone vasopressin, which, like oxytocin, has a strong effect on social and bonding behaviors in mammals and birds. The researchers followed up with two experiments: in one, they injected vasopressin into the brains of mouse parents from both of the wild species, and in the other, they genetically manipulated vasopressin neurons in the brains of house mice (Mus musculus) to excite them. Both sets of mice built lower-quality nests, suggesting that vasopressin and the gene responsible for producing it play a critical role in nest building.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results surprised Oliver Bosch, a biologist at the University of Regensburg in Germany, who was not involved with the new study. In his own research with rats and voles, vasopressin promoted some maternal behaviors. It is possible that the hormone serves different functions before the birth of pups than it does afterward, depending on whether parents are preparing for their babies' arrival or tending to them. “Maybe it's suppressed in the beginning, and then later it kicks in and promotes maternal behavior,” he says. It should come as no shock, after all, when the affairs of mice go astray.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe