New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Why Some Mice Seem to Make Bad Parents

 A single gene is linked to nest building in mice

Nurturing nesters: oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus) make good parents.

Andrés Bendesky and Hopi Hoekstra

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some wild mice are diligent parents, building elaborate grassy nests to keep their young safe and warm. Others are less attentive and construct shoddier homes for their offspring. Researchers recently identified a gene that regulates nest building—one of only a few genes known to affect parental behavior in mammals, including humans.

In a study published in Nature, geneticist Andrés Bendesky of Harvard University and his colleagues worked with two kinds of mice that are genetically similar but differ in their pairing behavior: a subspecies of oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus subgriseus) form monogamous pairs, whereas deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) mate with multiple partners. They also parent differently. Oldfield mice build more elaborate nests than their promiscuous counterparts, and they spend more time grooming and huddling with their pups, as well as retrieving stray ones. In the study, these parenting behaviors did not depend on the care that the mice received as babies—when pups of one species were fostered by parents of the other species, they still grew up to mimic their biological parents' nurturing habits.

In search of a genetic basis for these parental behaviors, Bendesky and his colleagues crossbred the two types of mice twice to yield nearly 800 grandpups. Among the second-generation offspring, one gene linked to nest building stood out—it regulates the hormone vasopressin, which, like oxytocin, has a strong effect on social and bonding behaviors in mammals and birds. The researchers followed up with two experiments: in one, they injected vasopressin into the brains of mouse parents from both of the wild species, and in the other, they genetically manipulated vasopressin neurons in the brains of house mice (Mus musculus) to excite them. Both sets of mice built lower-quality nests, suggesting that vasopressin and the gene responsible for producing it play a critical role in nest building.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results surprised Oliver Bosch, a biologist at the University of Regensburg in Germany, who was not involved with the new study. In his own research with rats and voles, vasopressin promoted some maternal behaviors. It is possible that the hormone serves different functions before the birth of pups than it does afterward, depending on whether parents are preparing for their babies' arrival or tending to them. “Maybe it's suppressed in the beginning, and then later it kicks in and promotes maternal behavior,” he says. It should come as no shock, after all, when the affairs of mice go astray.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe