New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Why Was Jupiter’s Rapid Growth Spurt Delayed for Millions of Years?

New evidence from the asteroid belt and other sources hints at a surprisingly complicated creation story for the giant planet

Jupiter’s clouds swirl in intricate patterns over the planet’s northern hemisphere in this view from NASA’s Juno spacecraft, captured on April 1, 2018.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

New research suggests why Jupiter, the largest planet in the solar system, waited about two million years for its early-formation growth spurt.

A team led by a Swiss researcher found that kilometer-size worlds smashed into the giant planet during that time, generating zones of high energy. This bombardment made it difficult for gas molecules to accrete, forcing the planet to grow more slowly.

The solar system is about 4.5 billion years old, and the a popular formation theory for planets says that they were formed out of an orbiting cloud of gas and dust that surrounded the young sun. Over time, the gas and dust clumped into small worlds, gradually accreting to each other to form the planets. [Our Solar System: A Photo Tour of the Planets]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Jupiter had a more complicated history, however. In a statement, research lead author Yann Alibert, an astrophysicist at the University of Bern in Switzerland, said it is interesting that smaller-sized bodies helped Jupiter accumulate mass, while larger-sized bodies crashing into the planet instead added energy to the planet—not mass. 

Alibert said Jupiter rapidly grew in its first million years of formation by gathering up centimeter-size pebbles, growing to 20 times the mass of Earth. 

However, the next 2 million years saw the planet pick up larger, kilometer-size small bodies, which are called planetesimals. Since these planetesimals were larger, they crashed into the planet with greater energy and released more heat, slowing Jupiter’s formation. So, by the time Jupiter was 3 million years old, it was 50 times the mass of Earth—experiencing a considerably slower growth rate.

After that phase, the planet quickly ballooned to today’s proportions, more than 300 times the mass of Earth, through runaway gas accretion, the new research found.

The University of Bern said this new data lined up with a separate set of results that another team of researchers gleaned from observations of meteorite compositions, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences last year. The older research was led by Thomas Kruijer, a researcher at the University of Münster in Germany and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.

Kruijer’s team found that the meteorites studied appeared to come from two “reservoirs” in our solar system that were separated into the inner zone of our solar system, and the outer zone, starting about 1 million years after the solar system formed. The pull of Jupiter, the researchers said, was the reason that material from the outer solar system, where Jupiter and the gas giants reside, could not interact with the inner part of the solar system, where Earth and other rocky planets orbit today.

The older research also suggested a delay in Jupiter’s growth, but the University of Bern team modeled the information in more detail to find out why. That same growth delay might have happened at Uranus and Neptune, but more study will be required to confirm the hypothesis.

A paper based on the new research was published today (Aug. 27) in the journal Nature Astronomy.

Copyright 2018 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 covering diversity, education and gaming as well. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time.

More by Elizabeth Howell

SPACE.com is the premier source of space exploration, innovation and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.

More by SPACE.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe