Wildfires Spark Population Booms in Fungi and Bacteria

Understanding how microbial communities change after a fire can help researchers to predict how an ecosystem will recover

A plume of smoke from wildfires burning rises over Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Wildfires are getting larger, burning hotter and becoming increasingly unpredictable, devastating plant and animal species. Now, researchers are studying how these blazes affect the tiniest of forest organisms—including bacteria and fungi—and finding that some microbes thrive after an intense wildfire.

A study posted last week on the preprint server bioRxiv reports that populations of several bacterial and fungal species increased after severe wildfires in the boreal forests of the Northwest Territories and Alberta in Canada. These kinds of studies, as well as others on how fire characteristics such as smoke affect the distribution of microbes, give researchers a clearer picture of how wildfires change microbial communities. This could help them to predict how ecosystems will recover after a conflagration.

“Fires typically don’t destroy a microbial community—they change its composition,” says Jessica Miesel, an ecosystem ecologist at Michigan State University in East Lansing. Some bacteria and fungi have a symbiotic relationship with plants, and this often dictates which nutrients will be available to vegetation in an area. If fires destroy certain microbial communities, then the plants that rely on them might not be able to re-establish themselves in that ecosystem.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Toughing it out

Researchers investigated wildfire impacts on bacterial and fungal communities in boreal forests of two Canadian provinces. The team collected soil samples from 62 sites about a year after 50 of them had been damaged by fire in 2014. They found that several bacterial species in the Massilia and Arthrobacter genera, and some fungi in the Penicillium and Fusicladium genera, were more abundant after a wildfire than before—especially at sites that burnt with greater intensity.

“We’re beginning to parse out the ecological drivers of response to fire,” says study co-author Thea Whitman, a soil ecologist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Microbes help to maintain ecosystem health by decomposing organic matter and readying nutrients for plants to absorb. Some types of bacterium break down nitrogen and carbon, and some fungal species live on the root ends of plants, helping their hosts soak up nutrients and water from surrounding soils.

Whitman suspects that a bacterium’s or fungus’s ability to reproduce rapidly, exploit available nutrients and survive high temperatures contributes to its success after a wildfire. Some microbes are better adapted to break down organic matter that has been chemically altered by fire, and others might take advantage of newly opened ecological niches.

Up, up and away

One way microbes might use fire to colonize new territory is by hitching a ride on small particles of ash or dust in plumes of smoke. In a study published last November, Leda Kobziar, a fire ecologist at the University of Idaho in Moscow, and her team collected smoke samples from three prescribed burns in Florida, and from tests on vegetation collected from an Idaho forest and burnt in the laboratory. The researchers found that the microbes present in the smoke differed from those lingering in ambient air.

Microbes are definitely getting caught up and transported in wildfire smoke, says Kobziar. In some cases, she suspects, nutrient-fixing bacteria caught in plumes might help to spur plant growth in faraway regions.

But this mode of travel can be detrimental if the spores of plant pathogens—such as the fungus-like organism (Phytophthora ramorum) responsible for sudden oak death—are caught up in a blaze and transported to areas with healthy trees. Firefighters and other emergency personnel could also inhale potentially hazardous microbes and allergens, Kobziar says.

Microbes are often neglected in conversations about the impacts of wildfire. But these minuscule organisms define the landscape around them after fire sweeps through. “There’s a whole host of changes in the soil environment that will favour or disfavour different groups of microbes,” says Miesel. When entire ecosystems are reduced to ash, microbes determine the first step on the road to recovery.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on January 16, 2019.

Jennifer Leman was formerly an editorial intern at Scientific American. Her work has appeared in Science News, Nature and the Washington Post.

More by Jennifer Leman

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe