New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Will Trackless Trams Gain Traction in the U.S.?

A hybrid form of transportation could be an alternative to buses or light rails

A trackless tram in Yibin, China, follows painted guides.

A trackless tram in Yibin, China, follows painted guides.

CRRC

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Joe Ciresi used to drive about 30 miles into Philadelphia for work every day. “It took anywhere from an hour and a half to three hours, depending on traffic,” he recounts. “I said, ‘This is insanity.’” Now a Pennsylvania state representative, Ciresi has been thinking about how to reduce the number of cars on the road. Recently he and his staff were looking at public transport options and encountered a video about trackless trams created by Peter Newman, a researcher at the Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute in Perth, Australia.

Public transportation is essential to reducing gridlock and emissions on highways and in cities, Newman says. But trains require extensive infrastructure spending, and historically buses have been unpopular because of potentially bumpy and traffic-slowed rides. Now, however, new technology can let buslike vehicles run on roads for a ride resembling the more popular experience of rail travel—without rails. Newman describes one example already running in China: a self-driving electric bus with optical sensors that let it follow a white line painted on the road. Its hydraulic suspension system, a type often used in trains, eases jolts.

“What impressed me in China was that the ride quality was ... equivalent to what I had experienced on a modern light rail, where everything is fixed on a steel track,” Newman says. To emphasize the technological advances making these souped-up buses more pleasant to ride, Newman advocates officially calling them “trackless trams.” He is working to bring them to Perth and says they are being studied or tried out in Zimbabwe and Qatar. “I think you'll find that in the next decade [the idea will] take off very quickly,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Trackless trams avoid the need for expensive rail systems, but they do require some changes to infrastructure. “Most of the cost of these new systems that we're building is in that cost of constructing the right of way,” says Yale Wong, a transportation researcher at the University of Sydney. In Ciresi's area of Pennsylvania, for example, creating a dedicated trackless tram lane would mean modifying about a dozen overpasses for the specialized vehicles. Wong notes that these changes could also support a dedicated bus route—but “people just don't like buses.” He suggests that a form of transit associated with rails (and with shiny new technology) has a better chance of earning the public's enthusiasm.

That is why Ciresi hopes to demonstrate trackless trams in the U.S. before pushing for infrastructure changes. “We do a test run, maybe for five miles ... and we find out if this is worth the investment,” he says. “I think, as Americans, we like to see the product and be able to hold, touch, feel and give our opinion of it.”

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Off the Rails” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 3 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0321-20b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe