Wind-Propelled Waters Drove Antarctic Melting for Millennia

During the past 11,000 years, wind patterns have pushed warm waters from the deep ocean onto Antarctica's continental shelf

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Shifting winds have helped drive West Antarctica’s ice sheet melting for millennia, according to a new analysis that could help scientists better anticipate sea-level rise.

The findings, published yesterday in the journal Nature, show that during the past 11,000 years, wind patterns have driven relatively warm waters from the deep ocean onto Antarctica’s continental shelf, leading to significant and sustained ice loss. That influx of warm water then halted for several millennia before beginning again around 1940.

More data are needed to explain those shifts, but atmospheric temperatures likely played a role, said Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand, the study’s lead author and a senior marine geologist with the British Antarctic Survey. Whatever the reason for shifts, the results demonstrate the importance of climate models accounting for the region’s winds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“By understanding the mechanisms that caused the retreat of the [West Antarctic Ice Sheet] over the past several thousand years, we can begin to build a clearer picture of what is happening today,” Hillenbrand said.

Gerhard Kuhn, co-author of the study, said, “Our results provide evidence that in the past, [West Antarctic Ice Sheet} retreat was also predominantly caused by melting through warm ocean water.”

Kuhn, from Germany’s Alfred Wegener Institute, added, “This gives confidence in the predictions of the current generation of ice sheet models which are used to forecast future ice loss from Antarctica and resulting sea-level rise.”

The area studied two of the continent’s largest glaciers, Thwaites and Pine Island, which drain into the sea and contribute to rising sea levels. But scientists have struggled to pinpoint how much—and how quickly—that should affect climate change models, with researchers in the last two years suggesting a U.N. panel had underestimated its impact by half, according toThe New York Times.

The new research draws from sediment samples taken at Pine Island Bay—one of the continent’s most inhospitable areas and, consequently, one of its least understood. The first reliable measurements of the area weren’t taken until 1994, so it’s hard to come by data that are more than a few decades old, said Hillenbrand.

The international research team spent 10 years collecting and analyzing sediment samples in order to find microfossils. Analyzing the chemical composition of those shells “acts like a fingerprinting” for the water’s temperature, Hillenbrand said, enabling researchers to trace the intervals when relatively warm water welled up onto the continental shelf.

The scientists say more research is needed to fine-tune their understanding. For instance, these findings trace the relative difference in water temperature, but more study is needed to ascertain the absolute temperatures from those periods.

“It’s often a hit-or-miss” in that area around the Amundsen Sea, Hillenbrand said, adding that researchers were able to flag areas for sampling but occasionally had to depart. “The conditions were changing, the wind picked up and got stronger, so it was impossible to hold the ship on station, or an iceberg came along so that the ship had to move out of the way.”

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe