New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Winged Microchips Glide like Tree Seeds

The tiny sensors could gather and transmit environmental data as they drift through the air

A tiny device next to ladybug for scale. Ladybug seems very large in comparison.

Three-dimensional microflier next to a ladybug for scale.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As spring ends, maple trees begin to unfetter winged seeds that flutter and swirl from branches to land gently on the ground. Inspired by the aerodynamics of these helicoptering pods, as well as other gliding, spinning tree seeds, engineers claim to have crafted the smallest ever wind-borne machines, which they call “microfliers.”

The largest versions of these winged devices, which the researchers sometimes refer to as “mesofliers” or “macrofliers,” are about two millimeters in length, roughly the size of a fruit fly. The smallest microfliers are a quarter that size. That makes them tiny enough to drift like seeds—but still large enough to tote compact microchips with sensors that gather information about the devices’ surroundings and wireless transmitters that send these data to scientists. Swarms of microfliers could be dropped from the sky to catch the wind and scatter across vast areas, says John Rogers, a physical chemist at Northwestern University. “Then you can exploit them as a network of sensors to map environmental contamination, disease spread, biohazards or other things,” he adds. Rogers and his colleagues describe the machines in a Nature paper published on Wednesday.

To help their contraptions descend as sedately and stably as possible, the engineers started by analyzing the shapes of airborne seeds such as those of big-leaf maples, box elders and woody vines in the genus Tristellateia. Then they used computers to simulate the airflow around similar shapes with slightly different geometries. This process allowed the researchers to refine a variety of designs until the microfliers fell even more steadily and slowly than their botanical counterparts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some microfliers were designed to spin like the seeds of woody vines in the genus Tristellateia. Credit: Northwestern University

For the devices to monitor a large area, Rogers and his colleagues would have to produce them in vast numbers—a task that would be easier if they could use existing facilities and processes for manufacturing integrated circuits. But these production methods primarily produce flat shapes, and the microflier designs are three-dimensional. To solve this problem, the engineers fabricated two-dimensional microfliers, then bonded them to a layer of a stretchy material called an elastomer. When they allowed this material to relax, it scrunched up, pulling the tiny devices into their final 3-D form. “We can build a very wide variety of different kinds of winged structures starting from that planar shape,” Rogers says.

Despite the devices’ novelty, the question of whether they will actually benefit environmental monitoring campaigns is still up in the air, says Scott Weichenthal, an environmental epidemiologist at McGill University, who was not involved in the study. “Do they measure reliably?” he asks. “Are they any better than what we can do now in terms of monitoring? That is unclear.”

Microfliers are fabricated as two-dimensional planes, and then a stretchy layer pulls them into their final 3-D shape. Credit: Northwestern University

The microflier is still just a proof of concept, Rogers acknowledges. But he and his team plan to conduct field tests soon. They aim to air-drop thousands of the devices that will change color depending on the amount of lead, cadmium or mercury present where they land. A drone will then fly overhead and take high-resolution images of the area, spotting the color-changed devices and thus letting the researchers map the concentrations of contaminants.

Of course, leaving tiny machines scattered over the landscape does not seem particularly sustainable. To avoid damaging local ecosystems, Rogers and his colleagues fabricated microfliers from environmentally friendly polymers, conductors and circuit chips that degrade over time. After collecting and transmitting data about their landing zone, the fallen fliers disintegrate and melt into goo, which then washes away. This is better for the environment—and more convenient for researchers. As Rogers put it, “We don’t want to be in a position where we have to collect all these devices afterward.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe