August 9, 2001

1 min read

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Women, Elderly Still Underrepresented in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials

By Kate Wong

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Though they comprise a significant proportion of the heart disease population, women and the elderly remain underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, a new study finds. Writing in the current issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Duke University scientists who conducted the research note that because the safety and efficacy of drugs against heart disease can vary according to sex and age, "these enrollment biases undermine efforts to provide evidence-based care to all cardiac patients."

The Duke team examined 593 randomized clinical trials investigating heart attack and unstable angina that had been published between January 1966 and March 2000. Although they did find an increase in the representation of women and the elderly in these trials over time, that trend was modest. Inclusion of the elderly in such trials rose from 2 percent in 1966 to 9 percent after 1990. Yet this group makes up nearly 40 percent of all heart attack patients in the U.S. Similarly, although the percentage of female subjects in these trials rose from 20 percent in 1966 to 29 percent after 1995, women account for 43 percent of heart attack patients.

"The universal extension of trial results from a younger, mostly male population to women and elderly patients may be inappropriate," team member Eric Peterson notes. "This paucity of information regarding the safety and efficacy of therapies in women and elderly patients may lead some physicians to withhold treatment in these subgroups.

The article "Understanding Clinical Trials," by Justin A. Zivin (Scientific American, April 2000) is available for purchase at the Scientific American Archive.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe