New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

When It Comes to Color, Women Have Pink Eye

Analysis of gender-based color preferences finds women favor pink (or purple)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The debate over whether gender plays a role in color preference has raged since the late 1800s, with some arguing sex doesn't make a shade of difference and others insisting that it does. One universal preference: blue appeals to all. But new research shows that girls really do prefer pink—or blue with a splash of red (think purple).

"We can only speculate about the universal preference to blue … from an evolutionary point of view," says Yazhu Ling, a research associate in psychology at Newcastle University in England and co-author of the new study published in Current Biology. "A clear blue sky signaled good weather, clear blue also signals a good water source—these would benefit us," she notes, "especially in our 'savanna' days" when people lived in hunter-gatherer societies.

Ling, and Anya Hurlbert, a psychology professor at the university, had 208 volunteers—98 men and 110 women—take computer-based tests during which they were asked to pick between two rectangles of different colors. The researchers concluded that there are two fundamental continuums underlying color preference: blue-yellowness and red-greenness. Whereas both sexes leaned toward blue on the blue-yellow scale, women showed a more profound preference than men for red to green on the second measure. Thirty-seven of the subjects had recently immigrated to the U.K. from mainland China. Although the Chinese men and women both showed a stronger preference for red than the British group, with the women still favoring it more, Ling says the male preference for red among the Chinese population is likely linked to cultural differences. "Red in China indicates happiness and luckiness," she says, "and is the prime color we use for festivals."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But why the overall female preference for, "redder blues." Ling speculates it harks back to hunter-gatherer societies. "The female, as gatherer, had to pick reddish fruits against green leafy backgrounds, therefore a preference for red against green may have benefited their food gathering and thus gained them evolutionary advantage," she says. "Evolution may also drive females to prefer redder faces (male faces are ruddier than female faces across all races). A reddish face often [means] good health; this may be a good cue to help the females to select mates."

Hurlbert and Ling plan to repeat their experiment in different age ranges of subjects of British and Chinese lineage. (In the current study they were 20 to 26 years of age.) They are also considering surveying other ethnic groups as well as babies to determine whether color preference is more a matter of nature or nurture.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe