New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Women's Fat Deposits Help Offset Load Imposed by Pregancy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though women may try their darndest to eliminate them, fat deposits on the thighs and buttocks are often there to stay. Men don't have similar deposits, and why and when this trait emerged in human evolution has proved difficult to pinpoint. Some researchers propose that it evolved as a sexual signal to attract mates. Others posit that such fat could serve as reserves in times when food is scarce. Yet none of these hypotheses explains why the fat deposits are located where they are. Now a report in the most recent issue of Current Anthropology aims to do just that. According to Polish researcher Boguslaw Pawlowski of the University of Wroclaw, the fat deposits may help to meet the balance requirements of two-legged walking during pregnancy and lactation.

Pawlowski notes that both during advanced pregnancy and when nursing, a human female has an additional anterior load that moves her center of gravity forward and upward, making bipedal locomotion more difficult and energetically inefficient. This imbalance can be particularly burdensome for women in traditional societies, many of whom work hard gathering food right up until giving birth. The addition of weight below and behind the center of gravity reduces those ill effects by offsetting the baby's load. Thus Pawloski suggests that evolution promoted buttocks and thigh fat deposits to compensate for the biomechanical handicap imposed by carrying a baby. "Without a counterbalance, inefficient walking and foraging could have put [early human females] at much greater risk of starvation and predation," he asserts.

As to when in humanity's long and complex history this trait might have arisen, Pawlowski speculates that it appeared only after the emergence of our genus, Homo, because ours was the first genus for which bipedal walking was obligatory. Furthermore, he observes, the the brain-size increase that characterizes the emergence of Homo "made Homo fetuses and newborns relatively large and therefore created more anterior weight during and after pregnancy."

"If Humans Were Built to Last," by S. Jay Olshansky, Bruce A. Carnes and Robert N. Butler (Scientific American, March 2001), is available for purchase through the Scientific American Archive.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe