Women's Fat Deposits Help Offset Load Imposed by Pregancy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though women may try their darndest to eliminate them, fat deposits on the thighs and buttocks are often there to stay. Men don't have similar deposits, and why and when this trait emerged in human evolution has proved difficult to pinpoint. Some researchers propose that it evolved as a sexual signal to attract mates. Others posit that such fat could serve as reserves in times when food is scarce. Yet none of these hypotheses explains why the fat deposits are located where they are. Now a report in the most recent issue of Current Anthropology aims to do just that. According to Polish researcher Boguslaw Pawlowski of the University of Wroclaw, the fat deposits may help to meet the balance requirements of two-legged walking during pregnancy and lactation.

Pawlowski notes that both during advanced pregnancy and when nursing, a human female has an additional anterior load that moves her center of gravity forward and upward, making bipedal locomotion more difficult and energetically inefficient. This imbalance can be particularly burdensome for women in traditional societies, many of whom work hard gathering food right up until giving birth. The addition of weight below and behind the center of gravity reduces those ill effects by offsetting the baby's load. Thus Pawloski suggests that evolution promoted buttocks and thigh fat deposits to compensate for the biomechanical handicap imposed by carrying a baby. "Without a counterbalance, inefficient walking and foraging could have put [early human females] at much greater risk of starvation and predation," he asserts.

As to when in humanity's long and complex history this trait might have arisen, Pawlowski speculates that it appeared only after the emergence of our genus, Homo, because ours was the first genus for which bipedal walking was obligatory. Furthermore, he observes, the the brain-size increase that characterizes the emergence of Homo "made Homo fetuses and newborns relatively large and therefore created more anterior weight during and after pregnancy."

"If Humans Were Built to Last," by S. Jay Olshansky, Bruce A. Carnes and Robert N. Butler (Scientific American, March 2001), is available for purchase through the Scientific American Archive.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe