Women's March on Washington Protestors Say Science Is a Driving Force

Marchers worry that the president's rhetoric and nominee choices threaten research, the scientific method and reproductive rights

By Dina Fine Maron

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The day after businessman and reality-TV star Donald Trump was sworn into office as the 45th president of the United States, hundreds of thousandsof protestors descended on the nation’s capital allied loosely under the banner of marching for human rights. More than 200 similar marches had also been planned in cities across the country.

The Women’s March on Washington started near the Capitol and brought together a far-flung coalition of individuals and groups. Some of the protestors said they were here to stand in solidarity with efforts to protect the rights of women and their families. Others said they came to register their dismay about the Trump administration’s stance on certain scientific and medical issues—including climate change, reproductive rights and the future of research funding. Some researchers who joined the march said they were alarmed over what might happen to science in general with Trump at the helm.

Here is a sampling of photos and comments from protestors who said concerns about science brought them out:

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Brittany Knapp, 23, Queens, New York

“I can't fathom having a president that doesn't believe in science, facts and morals. I can't stay silent anymore.”

Betty Zara, 63, Bethesda, Maryland

“I'm here not just for science but for human rights. I am for our planet. I'm disturbed our president thinks global warming isn't a concern.”

Angela Smedley, 66, Silver Spring, Maryland

“I'm very concerned about climate change's effect on our planet and our future.”

Lane Burns, 40, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

“Our current regime ignores facts and truth and encourages others to go with their feelings instead of facts.”

Gina Ferrari, 24, Washington, DC

“I am a nurse and so I support healthcare and combating global warming!”

Lauren Ward, 27, Washington, DC

“I work for the Smithsonian and I want to make sure our science programs continue to be funded. I have a particular interest in climate change - it is a matter of facts not an agenda.”

Maddie O'Brien, 22, Washington, DC

“I am doing a fellowship at the National Institutes of Health in neuroscience. I am concerned that women in STEM will be discouraged under this buffoon of a president.”

Alex Bayer, 31, Cincinnati, Ohio

“I am lending my voice to everyone else here because we need to save the planet.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American