New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Work Smarter, Vote Wiser, Sleep Better

A look inside the new issue of Scientific American Mind

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

I love my job, but research suggests I'm in the minority. A 2015 survey by the nonprofit Conference Board found that only 48.3 percent of Americans are satisfied at work. This has not always been the case. In the late 1980s and mid-1990s, job satisfaction hovered around 60 percent. To make matters worse, Americans spend an awful lot of time at their less than joyful jobs: according to Gallup, an average of 47 hours a week for full-time workers—nearly a full day beyond the 40-hour week. What does it take to find more fulfillment, less stress and greater productivity on the job? That's the question we set out to answer in our special report, “Work Smarter, Work Happier.”

Many modern employees worry that robots and artificial intelligence threaten their livelihood. Computer scientist Sandy Pentland of M.I.T. turns this idea on its head by showing how technological devices can actually foster the most human part of labor: the social connections essential to teamwork and innovation. “In the laboratory and in real life, we have found that these aids can help co-workers communicate better, find greater success and enjoy work more,” he writes in “Betting on People Power.”

In “No Workplace Like Home,” journalist Rachel Nuwer explores the growing trend of telecommuting, examining research that shows how distance workers can exceed their office-bound peers in both productivity and job satisfaction. And in “Give Me a Break,” contributing editor Ferris Jabr looks at solutions to what may be the single biggest stressor for the modern desk jockey: the failure to unplug from the always on, always connected workplace.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As much time as we invest on the job, we spend even more hours sleeping. Or trying to sleep. This is an active area of research for brain scientists, and both our Consciousness Redux column by neuroscientist Christof Koch and the opening stories in Head Lines look at fascinating new findings.

Finally, as the country lurches toward Election Day, we bring you several articles that are relevant to voting. British psychologist Kevin Dutton examines the intriguing—and alarming—overlap of personality traits found in politicians and psychopaths. Don't miss his assessment of the current presidential candidates. In our Perspectives column, behavioral scientist Supriya Syal and behavioral economist Dan Ariely extract lessons from research on how to improve voter turnout. Elsewhere, our inimitable advice columnist, Sunny Sea Gold, offers practical wisdom on how to be a more responsible, informed voter. It's worthwhile reading, whatever your politics.

Claudia Wallis is an award-winning science journalist whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Time, Fortune and the New Republic. She was science editor at Time and managing editor of Scientific American Mind.

More by Claudia Wallis
SA Mind Vol 27 Issue 5This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 27 No. 5 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0916-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe