Working Corridors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fluorescent bird droppings may help shed light on contested predictions in ecology. To keep species from becoming isolated in fragmented landscapes, conservation biologists often join the patches with strips of habitat, a strategy whose usefulness has been controversial. Ornithologists from the University of Florida at Gainesville and elsewhere devised a large-scale test of such corridors with eight sites in South Carolina pine forests. Each site contained a 100-meter-square patch with wax myrtle bushes, a key source of food for the eastern bluebird. This patch was surrounded by three isolated patches and connected to a fourth by a 150-meter-long corridor. After spraying the wax myrtle fruit with fluorescent powder and analyzing the resulting 11,000 fluorescent bluebird droppings, the researchers found the feces were 37 percent more likely to occur in the connected patch than in the isolated ones, suggesting corridors do work. Their report appears in the July 1 Science.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Working Corridors” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 3 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0905-34d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe