Worlds without End

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


News of another “planet” beyond Pluto may become common. First came Quaoar in 2002 and then Sedna in 2003. Unlike these two worlds, the latest candidate, announced in July, is actually bigger than Pluto, by 50 percent. Designated 2003UB313 and unofficially nicknamed Xena, the mass of ice and rock currently lies three times farther out than Pluto. Investigators originally photographed it in 2003 at Palomar Observatory near Los Angeles, but its strange orbit, tilted nearly 45 degrees off that of nearly all other planets, delayed its discovery until this past January. Near-infrared images reveal a surface of mostly methane ice, remarkably similar to Pluto’s. One or two more planets of like size might dwell within the same distance, says planetary scientist Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology. An untold number of worlds might lurk beyond that, perhaps deriving from the Kuiper belt or the hypothesized Oort cloud. “No one has really probed out to that distance,” he remarks.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Worlds without End” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 4 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1005-32b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe