Worm Genome Survey Reveals Fat-Regulating Genes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists are one step closer to unraveling the genetic secrets behind why some people become obese and others stay effortlessly slim. Gary Ruvkun and Kaveh Ashrafi of Massachusetts General Hospital and their colleagues have surveyed an entire genome¿that of the microscopic worm Caenorhabditis elegans (right)¿ to identify the full panoply of genes involved in regulating fat storage. The work, described today in the journal Nature, may help pinpoint breakdowns in communication between the brain and fat cells in a variety of animals.

To find the fat regulators, the researchers systematically inactivated genes one at a time and measured any subsequent changes in the worms¿ fat. Of the almost 17,000 genes tested, 305 inactivations caused body fat to decrease and 112 caused increased fat storage. About half of the C. elegans fat genes have human counterparts and as such could potentially inform the development of medications to treat obesity and related diseases, such as diabetes."If worm obesity was a health problem, we¿d have the cure," Ruvkun says. But for humans, there are still steps to be taken. What this work has done, he explains, is narrow the pool of genes that could regulate fat storage in humans down to "200 points on the genome that are the likely culprits."

The findings lend further support to the notion that body fat regulation cannot be explained by a simple energy balance alone¿it also depends on a long chain of biochemical command that begins with feeding control in the brain and ends with fat storage and use in the body. A fuller understanding of fat regulation may come from studying the newly discovered worm genes that encode molecules functioning in the nervous system and elsewhere outside of the metabolic pathway. "We¿ve identified molecules that seem to be olfactory receptors and others involved in sensory functions," Ashrafi says. The team also found that some genes cause fat-storage changes in worms with certain obesity-causing mutations, which bodes well for people whose overly fat figures are the result of a genetic short circuit.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Presumably, if these genes have the same effect on humans, there is great potential for the development of drugs," Ashrafi remarks. Indeed, pharmaceutical companies should find the large number of genes involved in fat moderation appealing. Says Ruvkun, "I wouldn't be surprised if half or more of these genes have no relevance, [but] my guess is that there are some that are potent."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe