New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Wriggling Energy Source May Power Auroras

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sky watchers at high latitudes are often rewarded with stunning celestial shows known as auroras. Conventional theory holds that large-scale electric currents flowing along the earth's magnetic field lines power the displays. Now findings published today in the journal Science suggest another source of energy for the heavenly exhibitions. Researchers report that Slinky-like wriggling of the magnetic field lines could help fuel aurora borealis events.

Andreas Keiling of the University of Minnesota and currently with the Center for Space Research on Radiation in Toulouse, France, and his colleagues analyzed electric and magnetic field data amassed by NASA's POLAR satellite over a one-year period. In particular, the team examined so-called Alfv¿n waves, which are movements in the magnetic field lines, at altitudes of 25,000 and 38,000 kilometers. According to their calculations, the rippling of the waves through the magnetic field provides sufficient energy to send electrons shooting into the atmosphere. The interaction of these energized electrons with certain atoms then creates the colorful celestial auroras.

"It's a substantial additional source in driving the aurora," Keiling notes. "One third of the energy could be driven by these waves." In addition, the pattern of energy distribution matched the distribution of auroral activity. Although they don't yet know exactly what causes the field lines to wiggle, the authors conclude that "the globally occurring Alfv¿n waves thus provide an important link from the magnetosphere to the aurora."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe